From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] Ordered I/O accessors
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:43:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100729104358.GA15621@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002d01cb2e55$bf328c90$3d97a5b0$@deacon@arm.com>
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 02:06:52PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Russell, Rabin,
>
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 13:03:10 +0200, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 04:01:12PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > This version replaces the do { ... } while (0) constructs in the final
> > > > patch with ({ ... }) to avoid errors in drivers putting brackets around
> > > > the write*() accessors. To avoid the write*() macro having a non-void
> > > > type (and possibly the compiler generating code to read a register), the
> > > > first patch explicitly casts the __raw_write*() accessors to (void).
> > >
> > > Ok. Can you please put this in the patch system? I think we need to
> > > get this in prior to 2.6.35 being released.
>
> Catalin's away at the moment and I'm not sure if he's picking up mail.
>
> > ux500 is using writel() inside uncompress.h, so this series triggers a
> > build failure there:
> >
> > arch/arm/boot/compressed/misc.o: In function `putc':
> > arch/arm/mach-ux500/include/mach/uncompress.h:41:
> > undefined reference to `outer_cache'
>
> There's also an issue with the iowrite* macros, which need a (void)
> cast in the same way as the write* guys.
I've fixed the io* macros up too. We need a patch to fix ux500 ASAP
though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-29 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-14 15:01 [PATCH v3 0/3] Ordered I/O accessors Catalin Marinas
2010-07-14 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ARM: Introduce *_relaxed() " Catalin Marinas
2010-07-14 15:15 ` Giuseppe Calderaro
2010-07-14 15:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-07-14 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: Convert L2x0 to use the IO relaxed operations Catalin Marinas
2010-07-14 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: Add barriers to the I/O accessors if ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE Catalin Marinas
2010-07-27 11:03 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Ordered I/O accessors Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-28 12:48 ` Rabin VINCENT
2010-07-28 13:06 ` Will Deacon
2010-07-29 10:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-07-29 10:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-28 21:09 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100729104358.GA15621@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).