ARM Kernel autobuilder

ARM Kernel autobuilder

[Vincent Sanders]

A short note to apologize to the kirkwood people over the autobuilder
producing junk results for their defconfig on the last few builds. The
ccache got corrupted due to a disk glitch. All fixed now.

The current level of 177 Configurations is (to put it mildly)
insane. The 5 year report posted previously explained the
specifics. suffice to say with Linus recent activities anything we can
do to reduce this count is useful.

Can I propose now the omap3_defconfig is working that the duplicate
defconfigs are removed, these are:

cm_t35_defconfig
devkit8000_defconfig
igep0020_defconfig
rx51_defconfig
omap3_beagle_defconfig
omap3_evm_defconfig
am3517_evm_defconfig
omap_4430sdp_defconfig
omap_ldp_defconfig
omap3_pandora_defconfig
omap3_stalker_lks_defconfig
omap_apollon_2420_defconfig
omap_h4_2420_defconfig
omap_2430sdp_defconfig
omap_3430sdp_defconfig
omap_3630sdp_defconfig
omap3_touchbook_defconfig
omap_zoom2_defconfig
omap_zoom3_defconfig
overo_defconfig

This would reduce the default configuration count to 156
configurations. 

There are still a huge number of configurations which support a single
machine which I may look at creating additional combined targets for
futher reducing the build count.

Finally the n8x0 and ns9xxx configurations have failed to build for a
while now.

The n8x0 config supports machines maintained by Kai Svahn, Lauri
Leukkunen and Timo O. Karjalainen can one of you please fix the build?

The ns9xxx configuration has been failing for even longer and teh
machines supported are maintainerd by Uwe Kleine-Konig


-- 
Regards Vincent
http://www.kyllikki.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20100722/6bdebb07/attachment.sig>

ARM Kernel autobuilder

[Arnaud Patard (Rtp)]

Vincent Sanders <vince@simtec.co.uk> writes:

Hi,

> A short note to apologize to the kirkwood people over the autobuilder
> producing junk results for their defconfig on the last few builds. The
> ccache got corrupted due to a disk glitch. All fixed now.

Thanks a lot for fixing that (I was really wondering what was the issue
as I couldn't reproduce it here) and thanks even more for all the work
you've done on the kautobuild stuff.

[...]

> Finally the n8x0 and ns9xxx configurations have failed to build for a
> while now.
>
> The n8x0 config supports machines maintained by Kai Svahn, Lauri
> Leukkunen and Timo O. Karjalainen can one of you please fix the build?

It has been discussed on the linux-omap mailing list :
http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=127832134917694&w=2

Don't know the status of the patch though.

Arnaud

ARM Kernel autobuilder

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:14:12PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> Can I propose now the omap3_defconfig is working that the duplicate
> defconfigs are removed, these are:
> 
> cm_t35_defconfig
> devkit8000_defconfig
> igep0020_defconfig
> rx51_defconfig
> omap3_beagle_defconfig
> omap3_evm_defconfig
> am3517_evm_defconfig
> omap_4430sdp_defconfig
> omap_ldp_defconfig
> omap3_pandora_defconfig
> omap3_stalker_lks_defconfig
> omap_apollon_2420_defconfig
> omap_h4_2420_defconfig
> omap_2430sdp_defconfig
> omap_3430sdp_defconfig
> omap_3630sdp_defconfig
> omap3_touchbook_defconfig
> omap_zoom2_defconfig
> omap_zoom3_defconfig
> overo_defconfig
> 
> This would reduce the default configuration count to 156
> configurations. 

Linus lately appears to be more relaxed about this, and is in the mood
for improvements in the situation, so yes this would be an improvement.
It certainly would make things a little smaller, and allow kautobuild
to run faster.

ARM Kernel autobuilder

[Shilimkar, Santosh]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-arm-kernel-bounces at lists.infradead.org [mailto:linux-arm-
> kernel-bounces at lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Russell King - ARM Linux
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 6:54 PM
> To: Vincent Sanders
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: ARM Kernel autobuilder
> 
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:14:12PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> > Can I propose now the omap3_defconfig is working that the duplicate
> > defconfigs are removed, these are:
> >
> > cm_t35_defconfig
> > devkit8000_defconfig
> > igep0020_defconfig
> > rx51_defconfig
> > omap3_beagle_defconfig
> > omap3_evm_defconfig
> > am3517_evm_defconfig
> > omap_4430sdp_defconfig
> > omap_ldp_defconfig
> > omap3_pandora_defconfig
> > omap3_stalker_lks_defconfig
> > omap_apollon_2420_defconfig
> > omap_h4_2420_defconfig
> > omap_2430sdp_defconfig
> > omap_3430sdp_defconfig
> > omap_3630sdp_defconfig
> > omap3_touchbook_defconfig
> > omap_zoom2_defconfig
> > omap_zoom3_defconfig
> > overo_defconfig
> >
> > This would reduce the default configuration count to 156
> > configurations.
> 
> Linus lately appears to be more relaxed about this, and is in the mood
> for improvements in the situation, so yes this would be an improvement.
> It certainly would make things a little smaller, and allow kautobuild
> to run faster.
> 
omap_4430sdp_defconfig is not duplicate. Please keep omap_4430sdp_defconfig because omap3_defconfig doen't includes SMP build.

Regards,
Santosh

 

ARM Kernel autobuilder

[Simon Horman]

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 07:11:05PM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 1010 at  6:54 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:14:12PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> > > Can I propose now the omap3_defconfig is working that the duplicate
> > > defconfigs are removed, these are:
> > >
> > > cm_t35_defconfig
> > > devkit8000_defconfig
> > > igep0020_defconfig
> > > rx51_defconfig
> > > omap3_beagle_defconfig
> > > omap3_evm_defconfig
> > > am3517_evm_defconfig
> > > omap_4430sdp_defconfig
> > > omap_ldp_defconfig
> > > omap3_pandora_defconfig
> > > omap3_stalker_lks_defconfig
> > > omap_apollon_2420_defconfig
> > > omap_h4_2420_defconfig
> > > omap_2430sdp_defconfig
> > > omap_3430sdp_defconfig
> > > omap_3630sdp_defconfig
> > > omap3_touchbook_defconfig
> > > omap_zoom2_defconfig
> > > omap_zoom3_defconfig
> > > overo_defconfig
> > >
> > > This would reduce the default configuration count to 156
> > > configurations.
> > 
> > Linus lately appears to be more relaxed about this, and is in the mood
> > for improvements in the situation, so yes this would be an improvement.
> > It certainly would make things a little smaller, and allow kautobuild
> > to run faster.
> > 
> omap_4430sdp_defconfig is not duplicate. Please keep omap_4430sdp_defconfig because omap3_defconfig doen't includes SMP build.

Are there any other reasons to keep omap_4430sdp_defconfig?
SMP seems to be a weak argument to me, after all if I peek in to
arch/x86/configs/ I don't see SMP and non-SMP variants.

ARM Kernel autobuilder

[Shilimkar, Santosh]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Horman [mailto:horms at verge.net.au]
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:35 AM
> To: Shilimkar, Santosh
> Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux; Vincent Sanders; linux-arm-
> kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: ARM Kernel autobuilder
> 
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 07:11:05PM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 1010 at  6:54 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:14:12PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> > > > Can I propose now the omap3_defconfig is working that the duplicate
> > > > defconfigs are removed, these are:
> > > >
> > > > cm_t35_defconfig
> > > > devkit8000_defconfig
> > > > igep0020_defconfig
> > > > rx51_defconfig
> > > > omap3_beagle_defconfig
> > > > omap3_evm_defconfig
> > > > am3517_evm_defconfig
> > > > omap_4430sdp_defconfig
> > > > omap_ldp_defconfig
> > > > omap3_pandora_defconfig
> > > > omap3_stalker_lks_defconfig
> > > > omap_apollon_2420_defconfig
> > > > omap_h4_2420_defconfig
> > > > omap_2430sdp_defconfig
> > > > omap_3430sdp_defconfig
> > > > omap_3630sdp_defconfig
> > > > omap3_touchbook_defconfig
> > > > omap_zoom2_defconfig
> > > > omap_zoom3_defconfig
> > > > overo_defconfig
> > > >
> > > > This would reduce the default configuration count to 156
> > > > configurations.
> > >
> > > Linus lately appears to be more relaxed about this, and is in the mood
> > > for improvements in the situation, so yes this would be an
> improvement.
> > > It certainly would make things a little smaller, and allow kautobuild
> > > to run faster.
> > >
> > omap_4430sdp_defconfig is not duplicate. Please keep
> omap_4430sdp_defconfig because omap3_defconfig doen't includes SMP build.
> 
> Are there any other reasons to keep omap_4430sdp_defconfig?
> SMP seems to be a weak argument to me, after all if I peek in to
> arch/x86/configs/ I don't see SMP and non-SMP variants.
OMAP4 is way different from OMAP3.

OMAP3:
	Coretex-A8 UP
	Internal L2 cache
	DSP System
	IVHA 
OMAP4 - 
	Cortex-A9, Dual Core 
	External L2 cache ( PL310)
	New Interrupt controller(GIC)
	New Memory subsystem (EMIF)
	3 Additional co-procesors
	New DSS
	IVHA2

Except ARMv7 architecture, there is not much common between these two SOCs

Regards,
Santosh

ARM Kernel autobuilder

[Shilimkar, Santosh]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-arm-kernel-bounces at lists.infradead.org [mailto:linux-arm-
> kernel-bounces at lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Shilimkar, Santosh
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 10:59 AM
> To: Simon Horman
> Cc: Vincent Sanders; Russell King - ARM Linux; linux-arm-
> kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: RE: ARM Kernel autobuilder
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Simon Horman [mailto:horms at verge.net.au]
> > Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:35 AM
> > To: Shilimkar, Santosh
> > Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux; Vincent Sanders; linux-arm-
> > kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > Subject: Re: ARM Kernel autobuilder
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 07:11:05PM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 22, 1010 at  6:54 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:14:12PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> > > > > Can I propose now the omap3_defconfig is working that the
> duplicate
> > > > > defconfigs are removed, these are:
> > > > >
> > > > > cm_t35_defconfig
> > > > > devkit8000_defconfig
> > > > > igep0020_defconfig
> > > > > rx51_defconfig
> > > > > omap3_beagle_defconfig
> > > > > omap3_evm_defconfig
> > > > > am3517_evm_defconfig
> > > > > omap_4430sdp_defconfig
> > > > > omap_ldp_defconfig
> > > > > omap3_pandora_defconfig
> > > > > omap3_stalker_lks_defconfig
> > > > > omap_apollon_2420_defconfig
> > > > > omap_h4_2420_defconfig
> > > > > omap_2430sdp_defconfig
> > > > > omap_3430sdp_defconfig
> > > > > omap_3630sdp_defconfig
> > > > > omap3_touchbook_defconfig
> > > > > omap_zoom2_defconfig
> > > > > omap_zoom3_defconfig
> > > > > overo_defconfig
> > > > >
> > > > > This would reduce the default configuration count to 156
> > > > > configurations.
> > > >
> > > > Linus lately appears to be more relaxed about this, and is in the
> mood
> > > > for improvements in the situation, so yes this would be an
> > improvement.
> > > > It certainly would make things a little smaller, and allow
> kautobuild
> > > > to run faster.
> > > >
> > > omap_4430sdp_defconfig is not duplicate. Please keep
> > omap_4430sdp_defconfig because omap3_defconfig doen't includes SMP
> build.
> >
> > Are there any other reasons to keep omap_4430sdp_defconfig?
> > SMP seems to be a weak argument to me, after all if I peek in to
> > arch/x86/configs/ I don't see SMP and non-SMP variants.
x86 has only two defconfigs and both are SMP. So you won't find an UP
machine there :)
arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig:CONFIG_SMP=y
arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig:CONFIG_SMP=y


> OMAP4 is way different from OMAP3.
> 
> OMAP3:
> 	Coretex-A8 UP
> 	Internal L2 cache
> 	DSP System
> 	IVHA
> OMAP4 -
> 	Cortex-A9, Dual Core
> 	External L2 cache ( PL310)
> 	New Interrupt controller(GIC)
> 	New Memory subsystem (EMIF)
> 	3 Additional co-procesors
> 	New DSS
> 	IVHA2
> 
> Except ARMv7 architecture, there is not much common between these two SOCs
> 

[PATCH] ARM: ns9xxx: fix FTBFS for zImage

[Uwe Kleine-König]

the different putc variants used an initialized local static variable
which is broken since

	5de813b (ARM: Eliminate decompressor -Dstatic= PIC hack)

This needs to be initialized at runtime and so needs to be global.
While at it give it a better name.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
KernelVersion: v2.6.35-rc6

 arch/arm/mach-ns9xxx/include/mach/uncompress.h |   30 ++++++++++++------------
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ns9xxx/include/mach/uncompress.h b/arch/arm/mach-ns9xxx/include/mach/uncompress.h
index 1b12d32..770a68c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ns9xxx/include/mach/uncompress.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ns9xxx/include/mach/uncompress.h
@@ -20,50 +20,49 @@ static void putc_dummy(char c, void __iomem *base)
 	/* nothing */
 }
 
+static int timeout;
+
 static void putc_ns9360(char c, void __iomem *base)
 {
-	static int t = 0x10000;
 	do {
-		if (t)
-			--t;
+		if (timeout)
+			--timeout;
 
 		if (__raw_readl(base + 8) & (1 << 3)) {
 			__raw_writeb(c, base + 16);
-			t = 0x10000;
+			timeout = 0x10000;
 			break;
 		}
-	} while (t);
+	} while (timeout);
 }
 
 static void putc_a9m9750dev(char c, void __iomem *base)
 {
-	static int t = 0x10000;
 	do {
-		if (t)
-			--t;
+		if (timeout)
+			--timeout;
 
 		if (__raw_readb(base + 5) & (1 << 5)) {
 			__raw_writeb(c, base);
-			t = 0x10000;
+			timeout = 0x10000;
 			break;
 		}
-	} while (t);
+	} while (timeout);
 
 }
 
 static void putc_ns921x(char c, void __iomem *base)
 {
-	static int t = 0x10000;
 	do {
-		if (t)
-			--t;
+		if (timeout)
+			--timeout;
 
 		if (!(__raw_readl(base) & (1 << 11))) {
 			__raw_writeb(c, base + 0x0028);
-			t = 0x10000;
+			timeout = 0x10000;
 			break;
 		}
-	} while (t);
+	} while (timeout);
 }
 
 #define MSCS __REG(0xA0900184)
@@ -89,6 +88,7 @@ static void putc_ns921x(char c, void __iomem *base)
 
 static void autodetect(void (**putc)(char, void __iomem *), void __iomem **base)
 {
+	timeout = 0x10000;
 	if (((__raw_readl(MSCS) >> 16) & 0xfe) == 0x00) {
 		/* ns9360 or ns9750 */
 		if (NS9360_UART_ENABLED(NS9360_UARTA)) {
-- 
1.7.1

ARM Kernel autobuilder

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:04:54PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> Are there any other reasons to keep omap_4430sdp_defconfig?
> SMP seems to be a weak argument to me, after all if I peek in to
> arch/x86/configs/ I don't see SMP and non-SMP variants.

SMP is a strong argument on ARM - a SMP kernel can't be booted on
UP machines, whereas on x86, a SMP kernel can be booted on UP machines.

ARM Kernel autobuilder

[Simon Horman]

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:59:18AM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Simon Horman [mailto:horms at verge.net.au]
> > Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:35 AM
> > To: Shilimkar, Santosh
> > Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux; Vincent Sanders; linux-arm-
> > kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > Subject: Re: ARM Kernel autobuilder
> > 
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 07:11:05PM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 22, 1010 at  6:54 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:14:12PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> > > > > Can I propose now the omap3_defconfig is working that the duplicate
> > > > > defconfigs are removed, these are:
> > > > >
> > > > > cm_t35_defconfig
> > > > > devkit8000_defconfig
> > > > > igep0020_defconfig
> > > > > rx51_defconfig
> > > > > omap3_beagle_defconfig
> > > > > omap3_evm_defconfig
> > > > > am3517_evm_defconfig
> > > > > omap_4430sdp_defconfig
> > > > > omap_ldp_defconfig
> > > > > omap3_pandora_defconfig
> > > > > omap3_stalker_lks_defconfig
> > > > > omap_apollon_2420_defconfig
> > > > > omap_h4_2420_defconfig
> > > > > omap_2430sdp_defconfig
> > > > > omap_3430sdp_defconfig
> > > > > omap_3630sdp_defconfig
> > > > > omap3_touchbook_defconfig
> > > > > omap_zoom2_defconfig
> > > > > omap_zoom3_defconfig
> > > > > overo_defconfig
> > > > >
> > > > > This would reduce the default configuration count to 156
> > > > > configurations.
> > > >
> > > > Linus lately appears to be more relaxed about this, and is in the mood
> > > > for improvements in the situation, so yes this would be an
> > improvement.
> > > > It certainly would make things a little smaller, and allow kautobuild
> > > > to run faster.
> > > >
> > > omap_4430sdp_defconfig is not duplicate. Please keep
> > omap_4430sdp_defconfig because omap3_defconfig doen't includes SMP build.
> > 
> > Are there any other reasons to keep omap_4430sdp_defconfig?
> > SMP seems to be a weak argument to me, after all if I peek in to
> > arch/x86/configs/ I don't see SMP and non-SMP variants.
> OMAP4 is way different from OMAP3.
> 
> OMAP3:
> 	Coretex-A8 UP
> 	Internal L2 cache
> 	DSP System
> 	IVHA 
> OMAP4 - 
> 	Cortex-A9, Dual Core 
> 	External L2 cache ( PL310)
> 	New Interrupt controller(GIC)
> 	New Memory subsystem (EMIF)
> 	3 Additional co-procesors
> 	New DSS
> 	IVHA2
> 
> Except ARMv7 architecture, there is not much common between these two SOCs

Thanks for the clarification.

Also, as Russell pointed out (which I didn't know),
you can't boot an SMP kernel on a UP machine. So I
now understand the significance of your original
SMP build point.

ARM Kernel autobuilder

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello Vincent,

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:14:12PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> The ns9xxx configuration has been failing for even longer and teh
> machines supported are maintainerd by Uwe Kleine-Konig
See patch that I just sent to this thread.  Russell: is it already to
late for .36?  Should I send my patch to your patch system?
There is also still a Kconfig-Warning in some imx-builds.

Vincent: one thing I noticed a while back is that kautobuild doesn't
report the section mismatch warnings.  See for example

	http://armlinux.simtec.co.uk/kautobuild/2.6.35-rc6/cam60_defconfig/zimage.log

It has:

	...
	  LD      vmlinux.o
	  MODPOST vmlinux.o
	WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es).
	To see full details build your kernel with:
	'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y'

Still

	http://armlinux.simtec.co.uk/kautobuild/2.6.35-rc6/cam60_defconfig.html

claims to have found no warnings.

Can you please consider adding CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y to your
build and extend the warning regexp?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

ARM Kernel autobuilder

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:34:44AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> Hello Vincent,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:14:12PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> > The ns9xxx configuration has been failing for even longer and teh
> > machines supported are maintainerd by Uwe Kleine-Konig
> See patch that I just sent to this thread.  Russell: is it already to
> late for .36?

No, I still have patches queued to go into the -rc series.

> Should I send my patch to your patch system?

Yes please.

[PATCH] ARM: ns9xxx: fix FTBFS for zImage

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

Subject: [PATCH] ARM: ns9xxx: fix FTBFS for zImage

btw, I don't think you mean FTBFS here.

	"fix fails to build from source for zImage"

is wrong.

	"fix build failure for zImage"

is better.

[PATCH] ARM: ns9xxx: fix FTBFS for zImage

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 09:20:44AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: ns9xxx: fix FTBFS for zImage
> 
> btw, I don't think you mean FTBFS here.
> 
> 	"fix fails to build from source for zImage"
> 
> is wrong.
> 
> 	"fix build failure for zImage"
> 
> is better.
I didn't thought much about it, but if F means "failure" it should be
OK :-).

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

ARM Kernel autobuilder

[Tony Lindgren]

* Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org> [100722 15:14]:
> Vincent Sanders <vince@simtec.co.uk> writes:
> 
> > Finally the n8x0 and ns9xxx configurations have failed to build for a
> > while now.
> >
> > The n8x0 config supports machines maintained by Kai Svahn, Lauri
> > Leukkunen and Timo O. Karjalainen can one of you please fix the build?
> 
> It has been discussed on the linux-omap mailing list :
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=127832134917694&w=2
> 
> Don't know the status of the patch though.

That's merged as 2b795ea00c2bbb077a1199a4d729c8ac03a6bded.

Regards,

Tony

ARM Kernel autobuilder

[Tony Lindgren]

* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [100723 10:29]:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:04:54PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > Are there any other reasons to keep omap_4430sdp_defconfig?
> > SMP seems to be a weak argument to me, after all if I peek in to
> > arch/x86/configs/ I don't see SMP and non-SMP variants.
> 
> SMP is a strong argument on ARM - a SMP kernel can't be booted on
> UP machines, whereas on x86, a SMP kernel can be booted on UP machines.

Late ack from me to stop building other omap defconfigs than
omap3_defconfig and omap_4430sdp_defconfig.

Cheers,

Tony