From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:34:50 +0300 Subject: ARM Kernel autobuilder In-Reply-To: <20100723073051.GV31293@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20100722111412.GB10399@kyllikki.org> <20100722132400.GR31293@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100723040454.GA30291@verge.net.au> <20100723073051.GV31293@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20100803133449.GD5450@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Russell King - ARM Linux [100723 10:29]: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:04:54PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > Are there any other reasons to keep omap_4430sdp_defconfig? > > SMP seems to be a weak argument to me, after all if I peek in to > > arch/x86/configs/ I don't see SMP and non-SMP variants. > > SMP is a strong argument on ARM - a SMP kernel can't be booted on > UP machines, whereas on x86, a SMP kernel can be booted on UP machines. Late ack from me to stop building other omap defconfigs than omap3_defconfig and omap_4430sdp_defconfig. Cheers, Tony