From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Remove ARM default configurations which duplicate omap3_defconfig
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:35:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100804123533.GN9881@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100804113047.GA6852@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [100804 14:24]:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 08:35:36AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Vincent Sanders <vince@simtec.co.uk> [100803 23:23]:
> > > These configurations are no longer useful as the systems they support
> > > are covered by the generic omap3_defconfig
> >
> > Since the defconfigs will stay around at least for a while
> > in the compacted form..
> >
> > .. And until we have sorted out how to deal with which drivers
> > need to be compiled in or as modules for each board, I'd
> > rather keep these defconfigs around for now.
>
> That's a user optimization more than anything else.
>
> > Can we just disable building these with some blacklist
> > in Kautobuild?
>
> That's no the point. The point is that there's too many of these things.
> Most other SoCs get away with far fewer defconfigs than OMAP does, and I
> don't see why OMAP should get any kind of special treatment on this.
>
> > So Not-yet-acked-by until some Kconfig issues are sorted out :)
>
> We've known that the defconfig situation is a hot potato since just
> after the last merge window, and we should consider ourselves lucky
> that through Uwe's work, Linus has stepped back from removing all
> the defconfigs. Had that not happened, we would now be looking at
> all the defconfigs being removed.
>
> I've also been on at people throughout the last three months over this
> issue, and it's gained very little traction. What's waiting another
> three months going to achieve? All that I can see is it'll just be a
> delay of execution.
>
> So, I'm going to give it a week, and then I'm applying this patch. As
> Linus said when he was talking about removing all the defconfigs, if
> people want to keep them around, put them on a website or similar. We've
> already had enough time to sort something out.
OK, fine. I'll add it to omap-for-linus and merge it. No need to
wait a week on this.
With the recent changes all known mach-omap2 boards should
be now bootable with just:
$ rm .config
$ echo CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP=y > .config
$ yes "" | ARCH=arm make oldconfig
Of course the drivers still need to be selected and CMDLINE needs
to be set for some boards not suporting bootloader cmdline options.
And CONFIG_SMP can't be selected on uncore boards.
Cheers,
Tony
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-04 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-03 20:19 [PATCH] Remove ARM default configurations which duplicate omap3_defconfig Vincent Sanders
2010-08-04 5:35 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-08-04 11:01 ` Vincent Sanders
2010-08-04 11:25 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-08-04 11:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-08-04 12:35 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100804123533.GN9881@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).