From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 10:55:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 3/8] wireless: wl1271: add platform driver to get board data In-Reply-To: References: <1281550913-17633-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <1281550913-17633-4-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB0324110ABD@dbde02.ent.ti.com> <20100811184742.GA21778@nokia.com> <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB0324110AC1@dbde02.ent.ti.com> <20100811185724.GD21778@nokia.com> <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB0324110AC7@dbde02.ent.ti.com> <20100811212513.GC827@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20100812095546.GA3354@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:40:19AM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > >I've outlined a far simpler and easiler solution > > which avoids this kind of abuse, and given suggestions on how to extend > > it to support multiple instances. > > > > Do you mean: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg95338.html > ? > > I was under the impression you eventually discarded that approach in > that post. Indeed. I'm talking about my first suggestion: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100804.114148.bf961e83.en.html which was later expanded by Vitaly: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100804.140119.f476c29c.en.html I don't think anyone had any negative comments against that proposal.