From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] mx35: Fix boot ROM hang in internal boot mode
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:17:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100813081720.GA23898@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100812121504.GC8670@local>
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:15:04PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 01:29:40PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:57:53AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + __raw_writel(cgr2, CCM_BASE + CCM_CGR2);
> > > > + __raw_writel(cgr3, CCM_BASE + CCM_CGR3);
> > > Note that my question concerning the UART clock was less about UART1 vs
> > > UART0 but more if the ROM really needs a UART clock.
> >
> > In my tests on an mx35pdk board, I found these three clocks being the
> > minimum set of additional clocks that need to be turned on. That means,
> > if you turn off any of the three, it won't boot anymore.
>
> For my tests, I didn't fully boot the kernel but inserted a while(1) after
> the clock init sequence. I had the wachdog already initialized in the
> bootloader, so after a few seconds it would boot again - or not.
>
> If you fully boot the kernel, then the driver will probably switch on
> the UART1 clock, so you don't notice the effect anymore. But the kernel
> can hang _before_ drivers come up, and it should still work. That's
> what hardware watchdogs are for.
>
> As a sidenote, it should be clear that this patch is a workaround for
> a serious chip bug of the MX35.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-13 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-11 23:37 [PATCH v2] mx35: Fix boot ROM hang in internal boot mode Hans J. Koch
2010-08-12 5:57 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-08-12 11:29 ` Hans J. Koch
2010-08-12 12:15 ` Hans J. Koch
2010-08-13 8:17 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2010-08-13 8:58 ` Eric Bénard
2010-08-13 10:04 ` Hans J. Koch
2010-08-13 10:25 ` Uwe Kleine-König
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-24 8:13 John Ogness
2010-09-24 10:10 ` Hans J. Koch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100813081720.GA23898@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).