linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] mx35: Fix boot ROM hang in internal boot mode
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:17:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100813081720.GA23898@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100812121504.GC8670@local>

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:15:04PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 01:29:40PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:57:53AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	__raw_writel(cgr2, CCM_BASE + CCM_CGR2);
> > > > +	__raw_writel(cgr3, CCM_BASE + CCM_CGR3);
> > > Note that my question concerning the UART clock was less about UART1 vs
> > > UART0 but more if the ROM really needs a UART clock.
> > 
> > In my tests on an mx35pdk board, I found these three clocks being the
> > minimum set of additional clocks that need to be turned on. That means,
> > if you turn off any of the three, it won't boot anymore.
> 
> For my tests, I didn't fully boot the kernel but inserted a while(1) after
> the clock init sequence. I had the wachdog already initialized in the
> bootloader, so after a few seconds it would boot again - or not.
> 
> If you fully boot the kernel, then the driver will probably switch on
> the UART1 clock, so you don't notice the effect anymore. But the kernel
> can hang _before_ drivers come up, and it should still work. That's
> what hardware watchdogs are for.
> 
> As a sidenote, it should be clear that this patch is a workaround for
> a serious chip bug of the MX35.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-13  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-11 23:37 [PATCH v2] mx35: Fix boot ROM hang in internal boot mode Hans J. Koch
2010-08-12  5:57 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-08-12 11:29   ` Hans J. Koch
2010-08-12 12:15     ` Hans J. Koch
2010-08-13  8:17       ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2010-08-13  8:58         ` Eric Bénard
2010-08-13 10:04         ` Hans J. Koch
2010-08-13 10:25           ` Uwe Kleine-König
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-24  8:13 John Ogness
2010-09-24 10:10 ` Hans J. Koch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100813081720.GA23898@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).