From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:58:55 +0200 Subject: ARM: LPC32XX: Various minor fixes and updates In-Reply-To: <1282174859-8780-1-git-send-email-wellsk40@gmail.com> References: <1282174859-8780-1-git-send-email-wellsk40@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100819085855.GA2747@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Kevin, On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 04:40:53PM -0700, wellsk40 at gmail.com wrote: > This patch set updates and fixes some minor LPC32xx issues. > > [PATCH 1/6] ARM: LPC32XX: Fix several clock device ID strings > [PATCH 2/6] ARM: LPC32XX: Fix naming convention issues with some defines > [PATCH 3/6] ARM: LPC32xx: Fix gpiolib bit mask macro > [PATCH 4/6] ARM: LPC32xx: Remove MMC peripheral clock enable/disable code > [PATCH 5/6] ARM: LPC32XX: Remove clock enable code for AMBA driver > [PATCH 6/6] ARM: LPC32XX: Add board.h for platform_data structures This looks confusing for me. Those patches come from your branch 'lpc32xx_up1' but some of them are also contained in 'wells/lpc32xx-arch_up1' which you already posted. So, this looks like a V2 of the series to me or am I wrong? If so, what has changed and why? If I might add, the increasing number of branches makes it hard to decide what is currently needed for a board-support; maybe a "for-mainline"-branch or something similar with all "state-of-the-art"-branches merged might help here? Kind regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: