linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com (Mathieu Desnoyers)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH for -tip 1/2] kernel.h: add MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 15:38:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100822193819.GA23299@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100822192705.GE1771@one.firstfloor.org>

* Andi Kleen (andi at firstfloor.org) wrote:
> > +/* Force a compilation error if condition is constant and not a power of 2 */
> > +#define MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n)		\
> > +	MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON((n) == 0 || (((n) & ((n) - 1)) != 0))
> 
> Looks super-ugly. IMHO just writing MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON(!n || n & (n - 1)) directly
> would be clear enough. If you really think that's unclear define a generic
> is_power_of_two() macro.

There is already a is_power_of_two macro in log2.h, but I fear it might
incorrectly interact with "MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON" (for some reason passing the
constant result of a static inline is not treated as a constant by the macro,
and thus it always "passes" the test).

So if everyone object to this new macro, I'd be tempted to just go with your
suggestion. However the fact that we already have BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n)
made me think that some people prefer to have it done as a macro.

Other opinions ?

Thanks,

Mathieu


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-22 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20100821141750.770348530@efficios.com>
2010-08-21 14:17 ` [PATCH for -tip 1/2] kernel.h: add MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2 Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-08-21 18:26   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-08-21 18:40     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-08-21 19:44       ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-08-22 19:27   ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-22 19:38     ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2010-08-22 20:16       ` Anca Emanuel
2010-08-22 21:03         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-08-21 14:17 ` [PATCH for -tip 2/2] Create generic alignment API (v9) Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100822193819.GA23299@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).