From: cjb@laptop.org (Chris Ball)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: move regulator handling to core
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:03:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100827190306.GB20407@void.printf.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1259844390-10541-1-git-send-email-daniel@caiaq.de>
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:46:30PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> At the moment, regulator operations are done from individual mmc host
> drivers. This is a problem because the regulators are not claimed
> exclusively but the mmc core enables and disables them according to the
> return value of regulator_is_enabled(). That can lead to a number of
> problems and warnings when regulators are shared among multiple
> consumers or if regulators are marked as 'always_on'.
>
> Fix this by moving the some logic to the core, and put the regulator
> reference to the mmc_host struct and let it do its own supply state
> tracking so that the reference counting in the regulator won't get
> confused.
Looks like this patch got dropped because of the missing modifications
to arch/arm/mach-omap2/mmc-twl4030.c. Are we still interested in the
patch otherwise, and can anyone help with that?
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-27 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-03 12:46 [PATCH] mmc: move regulator handling to core Daniel Mack
2009-12-03 13:06 ` Mark Brown
2009-12-03 13:14 ` Daniel Mack
2009-12-03 13:22 ` Mark Brown
2009-12-03 13:32 ` Daniel Mack
2009-12-03 13:40 ` Mark Brown
2009-12-03 13:43 ` Daniel Mack
2009-12-03 14:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-12-03 15:09 ` Mark Brown
2009-12-03 14:27 ` Adrian Hunter
2009-12-03 19:20 ` Daniel Mack
2009-12-03 20:12 ` Adrian Hunter
2009-12-04 11:58 ` Daniel Mack
2009-12-12 0:58 ` Daniel Mack
2009-12-14 17:43 ` Madhusudhan
2009-12-15 5:44 ` David Brownell
2010-08-27 19:03 ` Chris Ball [this message]
2010-08-28 14:48 ` Linus Walleij
2010-08-29 13:27 ` Mark Brown
2010-08-29 15:30 ` Linus Walleij
2010-08-31 11:07 ` Mark Brown
2010-08-31 12:15 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100827190306.GB20407@void.printf.net \
--to=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).