From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:21:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 32/74] ST SPEAr: Adding clk_set_rate support
In-Reply-To: <89c9cebf76e54242ec0d2cb0b7e90b2305db1b39.1283161023.git.viresh.kumar@st.com>
References: <cover.1283161023.git.viresh.kumar@st.com>
	<89c9cebf76e54242ec0d2cb0b7e90b2305db1b39.1283161023.git.viresh.kumar@st.com>
Message-ID: <20100902092123.GJ26319@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 04:08:56PM +0530, Viresh KUMAR wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rajeev Kumar <rajeev-dlh.kumar@st.com>
> Signed-off-by: shiraz hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>

Can't this patch be rolled into a previous patch - especially as it deletes
a load of code added by that previous patch (eg, clk_is_enabled)?  It
doesn't look like it depends on the other various changes between that
patch and this one.