From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:30:01 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] omap: Fix SMP on UP interrupt handling for multi-omap
In-Reply-To: <20100902162337.GP11597@atomide.com>
References: <20100817154035.GD20325@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20100819073810.GR12184@atomide.com>
	<4C6CFBAF.6020407@canonical.com>
	<20100819095705.GU12184@atomide.com>
	<20100819102025.GA32151@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20100820120622.GL25742@atomide.com>
	<20100830225527.GC11597@atomide.com>
	<20100902133637.GJ26319@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20100902161659.GJ11597@atomide.com>
	<20100902162337.GP11597@atomide.com>
Message-ID: <20100902193000.GX11597@atomide.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [100902 09:16]:
> From c04a57fc3b41d886f56ccdc27cf9758de0c95202 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:33:23 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH 6/6] omap: Fix SMP on UP interrupt handling for multi-omap
> 
> Fix SMP on UP interrupt handling for multi-omap

Here's this one updated to use !smp_cpu() instead of smp_on_up().
Looks like the description and subject needed some refreshing too.

Tony