From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm: fix pci_set_consistent_dma_mask for dmabounce devices
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 12:25:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100905112513.GB558@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100902114937X.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 11:50:33AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:57:38 +0100
> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 07:58:11PM +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> > > What's the outcome of the following?
> > >
> > > Russell, are you going to apply it as is, or is a better (short-term)
> > > fix being made?
> >
> > I want to see a better solution to this first - without which we'll
> > apply this hack and then quietly forget about the problem.
>
> This restores the trick that had worked.
>
> btw, I can't compile ARCH_IXP4XX without the following patch:
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg95933.html
>
> =
> From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> Subject: [PATCH] arm: fix arm: fix pci_set_consistent_dma_mask for dmabounce devices
>
> This fixes the regression caused by the commit
> 6fee48cd330c68332f9712bc968d934a1a84a32a.
>
> ARM needs to clip the dma coherent mask for dmabounce devices. This
> restores the old trick.
>
> Note that strictly speaking, the DMA API doesn't allow architectures
> to do such but I'm not sure it's worth adding the new API to set the
> dma mask that allows architectures to clip it.
>
> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-05 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-19 8:51 [PATCH] arm: fix pci_set_consistent_dma_mask for dmabounce devices FUJITA Tomonori
2010-08-28 17:58 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-09-01 8:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 2:50 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-09-02 5:59 ` Richard Cochran
2010-09-05 10:50 ` Eric Miao
2010-09-05 11:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-05 11:58 ` Eric Miao
2010-09-05 11:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-09-05 23:32 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-09-14 21:23 ` Krzysztof Halasa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100905112513.GB558@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).