From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Hacks to allow booting ARM SMP kernel on UP ARMv7
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:06:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100906100632.GC20903@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1283765910.1926.4.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 10:38:30AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 10:34 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 10:28:53AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > I haven't followed your patches closely but can we restrict the ARMv6
> > > SMP/UP support to only those cores that have TEX remapping (most of them
> > > probably)?
> >
> > We don't support TEX remapping on ARMv6.
>
> I know but it's easy to enable if useful for the SMP/UP v6/v7
> combination (with some restrictions).
It'll make proc-v6.S much more complicated than it already is, requiring
it to carry both the non-remap and remapping code selected via an ifdef.
Is it worth it? For the sake of one conditional in mmu.c, I don't think
so - and the view is that using TEX remapping to get rid of the shared
bit is a horrible hack anyway.
In any case, it's unnecessary. We can use my word-replacement to modify
a variable to indicate whether we're running on SMP or not, and so have
the test for SMP-on-UP in just one place. Like this:
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp_plat.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp_plat.h
index e621530..7de5aa5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp_plat.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp_plat.h
@@ -18,4 +18,19 @@ static inline int cache_ops_need_broadcast(void)
return ((read_cpuid_ext(CPUID_EXT_MMFR3) >> 12) & 0xf) < 1;
}
+/*
+ * Return true if we are running on a SMP platform
+ */
+static inline bool is_smp(void)
+{
+#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
+ return false;
+#elif defined(CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP)
+ extern unsigned int smp_on_up;
+ return !!smp_on_up;
+#else
+ return true;
+#endif
+}
+
#endif
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm/kernel/head.S
index 26ec521..360bf06 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/head.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/head.S
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ __fixup_smp:
orr r7, r7, #0x41000000 @ val 0x41070000
and r0, r9, r6
teq r0, r7 @ ARM CPU and ARMv6/v7?
- bne smp_on_up @ no, assume UP
+ bne fixup_smp_on_up @ no, assume UP
orr r6, r6, #0x0000ff00
orr r6, r6, #0x000000f0 @ mask 0xff07fff0
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ __fixup_smp:
tst r0, #1 << 31
movne pc, lr @ bit 31 => SMP
-smp_on_up:
+fixup_smp_on_up:
adr r0, 1f
ldmia r0, {r3, r6, r7}
sub r3, r0, r3
@@ -373,6 +373,14 @@ ENDPROC(__fixup_smp)
1: .word .
.word __smpalt_begin
.word __smpalt_end
+
+ .pushsection .data
+ .globl smp_on_up
+smp_on_up:
+ SMP(.long 1)
+ UP(.long 0)
+ .popsection
+
#endif
#include "head-common.S"
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
index d5231ae..fe94467 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
#include <asm/procinfo.h>
#include <asm/sections.h>
#include <asm/setup.h>
+#include <asm/smp_plat.h>
#include <asm/mach-types.h>
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
#include <asm/cachetype.h>
@@ -824,9 +825,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
paging_init(mdesc);
request_standard_resources(&meminfo, mdesc);
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- smp_init_cpus();
-#endif
+ if (is_smp())
+ smp_init_cpus();
reserve_crashkernel();
cpu_init();
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
index 6e1c4f6..a789320 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
@@ -303,9 +303,8 @@ static void __init build_mem_type_table(void)
cachepolicy = CPOLICY_WRITEBACK;
ecc_mask = 0;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- cachepolicy = CPOLICY_WRITEALLOC;
-#endif
+ if (is_smp())
+ cachepolicy = CPOLICY_WRITEALLOC;
/*
* Strip out features not present on earlier architectures.
@@ -399,13 +398,11 @@ static void __init build_mem_type_table(void)
cp = &cache_policies[cachepolicy];
vecs_pgprot = kern_pgprot = user_pgprot = cp->pte;
-#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* Only use write-through for non-SMP systems
*/
- if (cpu_arch >= CPU_ARCH_ARMv5 && cachepolicy > CPOLICY_WRITETHROUGH)
+ if (!is_smp() && cpu_arch >= CPU_ARCH_ARMv5 && cachepolicy > CPOLICY_WRITETHROUGH)
vecs_pgprot = cache_policies[CPOLICY_WRITETHROUGH].pte;
-#endif
/*
* Enable CPU-specific coherency if supported.
@@ -426,20 +423,21 @@ static void __init build_mem_type_table(void)
mem_types[MT_MINICLEAN].prot_sect |= PMD_SECT_APX|PMD_SECT_AP_WRITE;
mem_types[MT_CACHECLEAN].prot_sect |= PMD_SECT_APX|PMD_SECT_AP_WRITE;
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- /*
- * Mark memory with the "shared" attribute for SMP systems
- */
- user_pgprot |= L_PTE_SHARED;
- kern_pgprot |= L_PTE_SHARED;
- vecs_pgprot |= L_PTE_SHARED;
- mem_types[MT_DEVICE_WC].prot_sect |= PMD_SECT_S;
- mem_types[MT_DEVICE_WC].prot_pte |= L_PTE_SHARED;
- mem_types[MT_DEVICE_CACHED].prot_sect |= PMD_SECT_S;
- mem_types[MT_DEVICE_CACHED].prot_pte |= L_PTE_SHARED;
- mem_types[MT_MEMORY].prot_sect |= PMD_SECT_S;
- mem_types[MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED].prot_sect |= PMD_SECT_S;
-#endif
+ if (is_smp()) {
+ /*
+ * Mark memory with the "shared" attribute
+ * for SMP systems
+ */
+ user_pgprot |= L_PTE_SHARED;
+ kern_pgprot |= L_PTE_SHARED;
+ vecs_pgprot |= L_PTE_SHARED;
+ mem_types[MT_DEVICE_WC].prot_sect |= PMD_SECT_S;
+ mem_types[MT_DEVICE_WC].prot_pte |= L_PTE_SHARED;
+ mem_types[MT_DEVICE_CACHED].prot_sect |= PMD_SECT_S;
+ mem_types[MT_DEVICE_CACHED].prot_pte |= L_PTE_SHARED;
+ mem_types[MT_MEMORY].prot_sect |= PMD_SECT_S;
+ mem_types[MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED].prot_sect |= PMD_SECT_S;
+ }
}
/*
@@ -802,8 +800,7 @@ static void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
* rather difficult.
*/
reason = "with VIPT aliasing cache";
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- } else if (tlb_ops_need_broadcast()) {
+ } else if (is_smp() && tlb_ops_need_broadcast()) {
/*
* kmap_high needs to occasionally flush TLB entries,
* however, if the TLB entries need to be broadcast
@@ -813,7 +810,6 @@ static void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
* (must not be called with irqs off)
*/
reason = "without hardware TLB ops broadcasting";
-#endif
}
if (reason) {
printk(KERN_CRIT "HIGHMEM is not supported %s, ignoring high memory\n",
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-06 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-17 10:53 [PATCH 0/4] Hacks to allow booting ARM SMP kernel on UP ARMv7 Tony Lindgren
2010-08-17 10:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: Add SMP_ON_UP Kconfig option for booting SMP kernel on UP Tony Lindgren
2010-08-17 10:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: Allow optional UP processor functions for SMP kernels Tony Lindgren
2010-08-17 11:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-08-17 11:20 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-08-17 10:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: Set separate proc-v7 functions for SMP Tony Lindgren
2010-08-17 10:53 ` [PATCH 4/4] omap: Fix SMP on UP interrupt handling for multi-omap Tony Lindgren
2010-08-17 11:07 ` srinidhi
2010-08-17 11:30 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-08-17 12:14 ` srinidhi
2010-08-17 14:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-08-17 15:07 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-09-02 16:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-08-17 13:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] Hacks to allow booting ARM SMP kernel on UP ARMv7 Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-08-17 14:12 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-08-17 15:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-08-19 7:38 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-08-19 9:38 ` Bryan Wu
2010-08-19 9:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-08-19 10:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-08-20 12:06 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-08-30 22:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-02 13:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 16:16 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-02 16:18 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: Add inline function smp_on_up() for early init testing Tony Lindgren
2010-09-02 17:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 17:15 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Tony Lindgren
2010-09-02 17:42 ` [PATCH 1/6] " Tony Lindgren
2010-09-02 19:26 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: Add inline function smp_cpu() " Tony Lindgren
2010-09-03 0:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-03 2:22 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-03 8:58 ` Will Deacon
2010-09-03 9:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-03 9:07 ` Will Deacon
2010-09-03 12:12 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-09-03 12:23 ` Will Deacon
2010-09-03 12:31 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-09-05 1:53 ` Michał Nazarewicz
2010-09-03 12:09 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: Add inline function smp_on_up() " Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-09-06 10:17 ` Bryan Wu
2010-09-08 3:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-08 20:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-09 3:45 ` Bryan Wu
2010-09-02 16:19 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: Use SMP and UP macros for cacheflush Tony Lindgren
2010-09-03 11:57 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-09-04 10:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-04 11:01 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-09-02 16:20 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: Fix v7wbi_tlb_flags for SMP on UP Tony Lindgren
2010-09-02 16:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 16:34 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-02 23:47 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-03 9:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-03 9:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-03 17:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-03 19:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-06 11:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-09-06 15:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-06 15:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-09-06 16:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-06 17:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-09-02 16:21 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: Do not call test_for_ipi or test_for_ltrirq on UP systems Tony Lindgren
2010-09-03 12:00 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-09-04 10:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-04 10:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 16:22 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: Don't set TLB ops broadcasting on UP ARMv7 Tony Lindgren
2010-09-02 16:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 17:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-02 18:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 18:13 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-02 18:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 16:23 ` [PATCH 6/6] omap: Fix SMP on UP interrupt handling for multi-omap Tony Lindgren
2010-09-02 19:30 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-03 12:15 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-09-08 3:30 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-03 12:06 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-09-04 11:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-04 11:22 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-09-03 4:20 ` [PATCH 0/4] Hacks to allow booting ARM SMP kernel on UP ARMv7 Bryan Wu
2010-09-03 7:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-06 9:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-09-06 9:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-06 9:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-09-06 10:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-09-06 10:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-09-02 13:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-03 1:39 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-08-23 16:59 ` Will Deacon
2010-08-30 22:53 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-06 10:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-06 15:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-09-06 18:03 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-08 3:09 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-08 3:12 ` [PATCH] ARM: Check for is_smp for tlb_ops and cache_ops boardcast Tony Lindgren
2010-09-08 3:14 ` [PATCH] ARM: Don't try to send IPI on UP systems with CONFIG_SMP Tony Lindgren
2010-09-08 3:17 ` [PATCH] omap: Fix CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMERS initialization for multi-omap Tony Lindgren
2010-09-08 7:26 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-09-08 7:30 ` [PATCH] ARM: Don't try to send IPI on UP systems with CONFIG_SMP Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-09-08 8:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-08 19:32 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-10-05 22:19 ` [PATCH] ARM: Check for is_smp for tlb_ops and cache_ops boardcast Tony Lindgren
2010-10-05 22:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-10-06 14:44 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-10-06 22:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-10-06 23:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-14 18:59 ` [PATCH] ARM: Handle __flush_icache_all for CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP Tony Lindgren
2010-09-14 19:03 ` [PATCH] omap: Update omap3_defconfig to work with SMP_ON_UP Tony Lindgren
2010-09-14 19:05 ` [PATCH] omap: Update omap3_defconfig for omap2 Tony Lindgren
2010-09-14 19:17 ` [PATCH] omap: Update omap3_defconfig to work with SMP_ON_UP Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-09-14 20:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-15 6:11 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-09-15 16:11 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-15 18:25 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-09-15 23:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-16 17:05 ` [PATCH] ARM: Handle __flush_icache_all for CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP Catalin Marinas
2010-09-21 16:16 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100906100632.GC20903@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).