From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:39:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/7] wireless: wl12xx: add platform data passing support
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikSP874gnsPrc_M1LJYNpjX+Lz3-5=Bk5_HtgP+@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1283376410-9999-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com>
	<1283376410-9999-4-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com>
	<AANLkTi=goLEUqM1XQ__PrGu4=Erw2utaNP4qFmSgRta2@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100906120716.GE20903@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<AANLkTikAFCd+3ggZKhQXY=+bG==KgLkv3qNVdEGa=GBX@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinM8vY7CygEN6DBR35WLkU-QOBwuiaRrpfwF6Mz@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikSP874gnsPrc_M1LJYNpjX+Lz3-5=Bk5_HtgP+@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20100915163939.GU8647@atomide.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

* Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> [100915 01:18]:
> 2010/9/15 Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>:
> >> Sorry for pushing at this, but why would you mark data that's meant to
> >> be used after init phase as __initdata?
> >
> > I can remove the first copying as well if Russell is ok with it.
> 
> I personally think it's not worth it. This copying basically happens
> only once and this point is soooo irrelevant. My position therefore
> is: let's get the current implementation in, and if Michal is
> uncomfortable with that, he can come up with the patch. Let's
> concentrate on the real problems.

This becomes an issue when compiling in support for multiple
boards.. All the data that's not in use for the booted board
should be __initdata.

Regards,

Tony