From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:16:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 03/14] davinci: map sram using MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED
	instead of MT_DEVICE
In-Reply-To: <1284716878-27667-4-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
References: <1284716878-27667-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
	<1284716878-27667-2-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
	<1284716878-27667-3-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
	<1284716878-27667-4-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Message-ID: <20100917101602.GC27467@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:17:47PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Davinci SRAM is mapped as MT_DEVICE becasue of the section
> mapping pre-requisite instead of intended MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED
> 
> Since the section mapping limitation gets fixed with first
> patch in this series, the MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED can be used now.
> 
> Have not tested this, so somebody with Davinci hardware can
> try this out

Is this still true?