From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: balbi@ti.com (Felipe Balbi) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:19:24 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 14/14] omap4: Fix bootup crash observed with higher CPU clocks In-Reply-To: References: <1284716878-27667-12-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1284716878-27667-13-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1284716878-27667-14-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1284716878-27667-15-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <7A436F7769CA33409C6B44B358BFFF0C014F13A77C@dlee02.ent.ti.com> <7A436F7769CA33409C6B44B358BFFF0C014F13A782@dlee02.ent.ti.com> <20100917104133.GP26474@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> Message-ID: <20100917111924.GU26474@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 06:17:47AM -0500, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: >On OMAP4 specifically, the wait IDLEST support isn't there in the >clock framework. This is taken care now in hwmod framework. With >that we see that we don't need this delay anymore. > >The delay change is there for some time. May be there were issue >with wait IDLEST. ok, I see. Kevin, any plans to remove this hack ? -- balbi