From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cjb@laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:59:28 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 5/5] sdhci-s3c: Add support no internal clock divider in host controller In-Reply-To: References: <1284626223-18944-1-git-send-email-jeongbae.seo@samsung.com> <1284626223-18944-6-git-send-email-jeongbae.seo@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20100917155928.GA7561@void.printf.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:08:28PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > Well there are two implementations. and no conclusion yet. > as s5pc210 don't support internal SDHCI clock, DMC overrides the > function operation itself when s5pc210. System LSI use the quirks. > > Choose any one from MMC maintainer. Both approaches are generally acceptable for MMC, so I would want to leave it up to the maintainer of the driver in question (which is Ben, in this case?) to choose between them. That said, I think my own mild preference is for Jaehoon's approach. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child