From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cjb@laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 02:17:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] sdhci-s3c: fix incorrect spinlock usage after merge In-Reply-To: <1284987822-17955-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> References: <1284987822-17955-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20100921011711.GB5873@void.printf.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:03:42PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > In the commit f522886e202a34a2191dd5d471b3c4d46410a9a0 a merge conflict > in the sdhci-s3c driver been fixed. However the fix used incorrect > spinlock operation - it cause a race with sdhci interrupt service. The > correct way to solve it is to use spin_lock_irqsave/irqrestore() calls. Thanks, applied to mmc-next with: Signed-off-by: Chris Ball Andrew, not sure how best to get this upstream -- do you want to send this up to Linus (for -rc5) via your queue in -mm? -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child