From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer) Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:25:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: add possibility for cyclic transfers In-Reply-To: References: <1281956870-12463-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <1281956870-12463-2-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <20100920130119.GA23406@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20100924072544.GN23406@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:42:20PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > > > Any comment to this patch? > > Looks good to me especially given the unique implications for > callbacks. Although, I'd like to put a description of the > prep_dma_cyclic semantics in the source code. Can you respin this > with a description added to the kernel-doc for struct dma_device? Sure, will do. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |