linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] omap2 sparse fixes
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:07:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100927140747.GA13143@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E0D41E29EB0DAC4E9F3FF173962E9E9402DB3F8D00@dbde02.ent.ti.com>

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 07:11:37PM +0530, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
> > Can you please check that? Will not merge for now until we 
> > figure out what changes with these patches.
> > 
> > Then, I also noticed the following exports getting added:
> > 
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(omap2_gp_clockevent_set_gptimer);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(omapfb_reserve_sram);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(omap_sram_init);
> > 
> > These should not be exported, they are only intended to be 
> > called from the low-level platform init code. So exporting 
> > them is not the right fix for these.
> 
> I have declared these API's as extern functions in respective
> header files.

It's hard to tell whether you're justifying having the EXPORT_SYMBOLs
there or not from your reply.

Just because you add them as declarations to a header file does not mean
you have to add EXPORT_SYMBOLs for them.  The only thing that this macro
does is make them available to modules.

In any case, if functions are marked as __init (or similar, which some
are) then they must not be exported - they won't exist when modules are
available to be loaded.  Instead, their symbols will point to some
random data which has replaced the code.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-27 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-22  8:56 [GIT PULL] omap2 sparse fixes G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2010-09-23 22:58 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-24 19:43   ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2010-09-25  0:19     ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-25  6:21       ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2010-09-27 13:41       ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2010-09-27 14:07         ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-09-27 15:00           ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2010-09-28  8:12       ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2010-09-28 15:21         ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-28 15:35           ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2010-09-28 18:31             ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-29 19:51               ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2010-09-29 21:56                 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-09-29 23:46                   ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2010-10-05  2:14                     ` Tony Lindgren
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-22  8:49 G, Manjunath Kondaiah

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100927140747.GA13143@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).