From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: l.majewski@samsung.com (Lukasz Majewski) Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 08:46:46 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 4/5] mfd: regulator: max8998: voltages and GPIOs defined at platform data structure In-Reply-To: <1286026413.3125.27.camel@odin> References: <1285590747-32404-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1285590747-32404-5-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <20100927184336.GK2560@sortiz-mobl> <1286026413.3125.27.camel@odin> Message-ID: <20101004084646.4de3714d@lmajewski.digital.local> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:33:33 +0100 Liam Girdwood wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 20:43 +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > > Hi Lukasz, > > > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:32:26PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski > > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park > > Fine with me: > > Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz > > > > Lukasz, this is not applying against the regulator next tree. > Can you redo and add Mark and Samuels Acks. > > Thanks > > Liam Hi Liam, I've fetched the newest voltage-2.6/for-next and merge it with newest mfd-2.6/for next. After that all patches are applying and kernel is building without errors. The problem with this patch series is that it "touches" two repositories: voltage-2.6 and mfd-2.6. I'm a bit confused how such situation should be resolved, since it involves two separate repositories (and two maintainers to cooperate). -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung Poland R0d5c1f412cf166c0cd87b0f6eb7fed70a2&D Center Platform Group