linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/22] arm: introduce little endian bitops
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:07:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101018150737.GI12449@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201010181645.13349.arnd@arndb.de>

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 04:45:12PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Note that patches 20 and 22 of the series completely eliminate the
> the minix and ext2 definitions, putting them into architecture independent
> code in those two file systems where they belong.

Good.

> Adding the new definitions in patch 4 is just a logical step before removing
> the old definitions in the later patches while maintaining bisectability.

In which case I don't have a problem with the series.

> > What I'm trying to say is please don't make the existing mess of bitops
> > any worse than it currently is.
> 
> The series currently adds 20 lines to the arm code (could be reduced to
> 6 lines), but removes 26 lines which are essentially architecture
> independent and shouldn't be there to start with. I'd call that the
> opposite of making the mess worse.

Right - if I could've seen the rest of the series, then maybe I'd have
known that.  However, I seemed to have silently dropped off linux-arch
back in April and only just noticed, which means I've missed rather a
lot...

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-18 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1287135981-17604-1-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
2010-10-15  9:46 ` [PATCH 04/22] arm: introduce little endian bitops Akinobu Mita
2010-10-18  9:26   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-10-18 13:22     ` Akinobu Mita
2010-10-18 13:56       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-10-18 14:45         ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-18 15:07           ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-10-18 13:58       ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101018150737.GI12449@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).