From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:34:09 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Allow late mdesc detection, v4 In-Reply-To: References: <1282553423.737985.983362819420.0.gpush@pororo> <20100901073913.GF8142@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20101018141956.GF12449@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20101019013409.GN13341@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Nicolas Pitre [101018 07:23]: > On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:42:04PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > I think that time has come, or is very close. And since Jeremy is away > > > on vacation he asked me to handle the submission for those patches on > > > his behalf. > > > > > > So... could you pull the following: > > > > > > git://git.linaro.org/people/nico/linux debug_cleanup > > > > > > It is currently based on your devel branch at commit f7de6b55ea4. If > > > you'd prefer another base just tell me. > > > > I'm going to drop this - there's still a few trees which are outstanding > > and this is causing problems... I think we have a few days left. > > > > With Eric's changes merged, there's another io_pg_offst which has popped > > up in mach-mmp, and there's a few new OMAP boards external to my tree > > which are broken by this. > > No problem. Just tell me when you're done merging those other trees and > I'll rebase/adjust this series on top for you to pull again. Hmm, these patches are not a problem at least from omap tree point of view. We already tested an earlier version of these patches a while back, and I just applied them to our temporary omap-testing branch, and things work as expected. The only fixup that we need to fix up few omap specific board files. I've added the fixups to the omap for-next, and I can merge with mainline tree to fix these before sending the pull request. Regards, Tony