From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cjb@laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 03:36:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 5/6] mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: factor out common stuff In-Reply-To: <20101019022950.GC3485@pengutronix.de> References: <1287138064-21385-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <1287138064-21385-6-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <20101018161355.GA21088@void.printf.net> <20101019022950.GC3485@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20101019023642.GA11777@void.printf.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 04:29:50AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Stephen reports a -next build failure after this patch. Presumably this > > should be sdhci-esdhc.h? It's confusing that no-one else hit this. > > Uh, ouch, one brown paper bag, please! Yeah, confusing, that is. Ah, not that confusing -- sdhci-of-esdhc.c essentially depends on PPC, and MMC_SDHCI_ESDHC_IMX depends on ARM, and I imagine we've only had testing on the latter. > Regarding your patch: > > Acked-by: Wolfram Sang Thanks. When it comes time to send to Linus, I'll just roll this into your original [5/6]. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child