From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sameo@linux.intel.com (Samuel Ortiz)
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:33:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v3] TWL IRQ: Fix fucntion declaration warnings
In-Reply-To: <20101019092816.GD11713@pengutronix.de>
References: <1286315819-5906-1-git-send-email-manjugk@ti.com>
	<1286315819-5906-4-git-send-email-manjugk@ti.com>
	<20101019090613.GA2736@sortiz-mobl>
	<20101019092816.GD11713@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <20101019103344.GL2736@sortiz-mobl>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Uwe,

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:28:16AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:06:14AM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > Hi Manjunath,
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 03:26:59AM +0530, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
> > > Fixes following sparse warnings for twl4030 and twl6030 irq files.
> > > 
> > > drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c:783:5: warning: symbol 'twl4030_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > > drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c:863:5: warning: symbol 'twl4030_exit_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > > drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c:873:5: warning: symbol 'twl4030_init_chip_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > > 
> > > drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c:226:5: warning: symbol 'twl6030_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > > drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c:290:5: warning: symbol 'twl6030_exit_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > >
> > Patch applied, thanks.
> I didn't get the original patch, so I just now noticed the typo in the
> Subject.  You might want to do s/fucntion/function/
Yes, I noticed as well and fixed it, thanks.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/