From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv6 1/3] ARM: imx: Add gpio-keys to plat-mxc
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:50:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101023095049.GC8554@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CC2977D.8060409@eukrea.com>
Hello Eric,
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 10:06:21AM +0200, Eric B?nard wrote:
> Le 23/10/2010 04:46, Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com a ?crit :
>> +struct platform_device *__init imx_add_gpio_keys(
>> + const struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata)
>> +{
>> + return imx_add_platform_device("gpio-keys", -1, NULL,
>> + 0, pdata, sizeof(*pdata));
>> +}
>
> What is the added value of this ?
Is is (more or less) in line with the other imx functions that
dynamically add platform devices.
> gpio-keys is not i.MX specific so why should that land in plat-mxc ?
I consider it OK for now. I know Eric does/wants something similar for
pxa. If you want to push forward unification here that's great, but
IMHO this is nothing that should stop this patch which is a good step
forward.
BTW another low hanging fruit is to use use
platform_device_register_resndata to implement imx_add_platform_device
and add a few additional checks, like warn if CONFIG_DEBUG_SOMETHING is
enabled and data is non-NULL and doesn't point to .init-memory.)
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-23 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-23 2:46 [PATCHv6 1/3] ARM: imx: Add gpio-keys to plat-mxc Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com
2010-10-23 2:46 ` [PATCHv6 2/3] ARM: mx5: Add gpio-keys to mx51 babbage board Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com
2010-10-23 2:46 ` [PATCHv6 3/3] ARM: imx: Add wake functionality to GPIO Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com
2010-10-23 8:08 ` [PATCHv6 2/3] ARM: mx5: Add gpio-keys to mx51 babbage board Eric Bénard
2010-10-23 8:06 ` [PATCHv6 1/3] ARM: imx: Add gpio-keys to plat-mxc Eric Bénard
2010-10-23 9:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2010-10-23 11:38 ` Eric Bénard
2010-10-24 19:17 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101023095049.GC8554@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).