From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:38:58 +0100 Subject: [patch v4 06/10] efikamx: add leds support In-Reply-To: <201010300954.47839.marek.vasut@gmail.com> References: <20101027124044.980739780@rtp-net.org> <20101027124347.146428989@rtp-net.org> <201010300954.47839.marek.vasut@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20101102083858.GP31158@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello, On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:54:47AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Wednesday 27 October 2010 14:40:51 Arnaud Patard wrote: > > The efika mx a 3 leds (1 blue, 1 red, 1 green) connected on GPIOS 3 > > 13/14/15. Also, some special care is done for default trigger of blue led > > for mmc as the mmc host used is different between hw revisions > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnaud Patard > > Index: linux-2.6-submit/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_efikamx.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6-submit.orig/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_efikamx.c 2010-10-27 > > 11:26:16.000000000 +0200 +++ > > linux-2.6-submit/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_efikamx.c 2010-10-27 > > 11:27:38.000000000 +0200 @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ > > #include > > #include > > #include > > +#include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > @@ -43,6 +44,10 @@ > > #define EFIKAMX_PCBID1 (2*32 + 17) > > #define EFIKAMX_PCBID2 (2*32 + 11) > > > > +#define EFIKAMX_BLUE_LED (2*32 + 13) > > +#define EFIKAMX_GREEN_LED (2*32 + 14) > > +#define EFIKAMX_RED_LED (2*32 + 15) > > + > > /* the pci ids pin have pull up. they're driven low according to board id > > */ #define MX51_PAD_PCBID0 IOMUX_PAD(0x518, 0x130, 3, 0x0, 0, > > PAD_CTL_PUS_100K_UP) #define MX51_PAD_PCBID1 IOMUX_PAD(0x51C, 0x134, 3, > > 0x0, 0, PAD_CTL_PUS_100K_UP) @@ -81,6 +86,11 @@ > > MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_1__ESDHC1_WP, > > MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_7__ESDHC2_WP, > > MX51_PAD_GPIO_1_8__ESDHC2_CD, > > + > > + /* leds */ > > + MX51_PAD_CSI1_D9__GPIO_3_13, > > + MX51_PAD_CSI1_VSYNC__GPIO_3_14, > > + MX51_PAD_CSI1_HSYNC__GPIO_3_15, > > }; > > > > /* Serial ports */ > > @@ -179,6 +189,37 @@ > > } > > } > > Maybe this could be modularized ? > > #ifdef CONFIG_LEDS_GPIO > ... the platform_data stuff below ... > > efikamx_register_leds() > { > platform_device_register(); > } > #else > static inline void efikamx_register_leds() {} > #endif > > board_init() > { > ... > efikamx_register_leds(); > ... > } > > What do you think ? Cheers IMHO it's better to register all devices independently of the available drivers. So for me the used approach is OK. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |