From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 09:18:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arch/arm/plat-mxc/cpufreq.c: Fix line continuation defect In-Reply-To: <1289164215.29216.315.camel@Joe-Laptop> References: <1289164215.29216.315.camel@Joe-Laptop> Message-ID: <20101108081808.GN16938@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Joe, On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 01:10:15PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches > --- > arch/arm/plat-mxc/cpufreq.c | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/cpufreq.c b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/cpufreq.c > index 039538e..9f358af 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/cpufreq.c > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/cpufreq.c > @@ -154,8 +154,8 @@ static int __init mxc_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, imx_freq_table); > > if (ret < 0) { > - printk(KERN_ERR "%s: failed to register i.MXC CPUfreq \ > - with error code %d\n", __func__, ret); > + printk(KERN_ERR "%s: failed to register i.MXC CPUfreq with error code %d\n", > + __func__, ret); I'd prefer + printk(KERN_ERR "%s: failed to register i.MXC CPUfreq " + "with error code %d\n", __func__, ret); (actually I'd consider + pr_err("failed to register i.MXC CPUfreq (error: %d)\n", ret) even better, but this is out of scope for this patch, isn't it?) Thanks Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |