From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer) Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:09:12 +0100 Subject: [PATCHv3 1/2] ARM: imx: Add core definitions for MX53 In-Reply-To: References: <1288972551-21877-1-git-send-email-Dinh.Nguyen@freescale.com> <20101109214607.GG6017@pengutronix.de> <86A0E76937111F4C92FABEC0A20988510523D224@az33exm21> <20101110164640.GV6017@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20101110170912.GC8950@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 03:04:27PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > ... > > >> Agreed, but I was unsure how to proceed with adding clock code for mx53. > >> Should I merge mx53 clock code into clock-mx51 and rename clock-mx51? > > > > Yes, to something like clock-mx51-mx53.c > > > > Or maybe clock-mx5x.c would be more generic. > > This way when any other MX5x processor gets added we don't need to > change the file name again. This can happen with mx5x also when the next MX5x is incompatible like we had with i.MX2x when i.MX25 came out. Anyway, in this case I don't care much. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |