public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] RFC: nomadik: expand timesource to 63 bits
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:57:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101112095739.GH18358@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=ysONhPQBTbVNRgTOx5PGEM=STaUYY6RnUpfES@mail.gmail.com>

Hi John,

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:33:41PM -0800, john stultz wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Linus Walleij
> <linus.walleij@stericsson.com> wrote:
> > After wraparound-problems in sched_clock() we expand the 32bit
> > timer in the MTU from 32 to 63 bits so the scheduling and
> > timeline is more stable. At current max operating frequency for
> > the MTU, 133 MHz, this should be sufficient for rougly 2200
> > years.
> >
> [snip]
> > What we need to know is whether it's OK to simply blow up
> > clocksource to 63 bits like this. In that case this
> > simplification should also apply to Orion, meaning that it
> > would base it's sched_clock() on the clocksource, using
> > simply clocksource_cyc2ns() cutting down the code
> > significantly.
> 
> I would advise against expanding the hardware counter to 63bits via
> software at the clocksource layer. This breaks the
> CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS flag rule (since the hardware will wrap
> below the mask value if not updated in the software layer). And as
> Thomas said, this will cause problems in the nohz idle limiting code
> (which makes sure we wake up before the clocksource wraps).
> 
> Instead, I'd use this extension at the sched_clock level, where it
> seems reasonable that it will be called frequently enough to not brake
> the cnt32_to_63 magic.
Instead of implementing sched_clock for each architecture seperatly,
wouldn't it be nice to have a generic sched_clock that uses the
architecture's clocksource?  I tried to implement that some time ago,
but tglx shoot it down because of locking problems.

Maybe doing that became easier since then?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-11-12  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-11  9:05 [PATCH] RFC: nomadik: expand timesource to 63 bits Linus Walleij
2010-11-11 10:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-11-11 10:31   ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-11 11:05     ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-11-11 18:31       ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-11-11 19:00         ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-11-11 19:19           ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-11-11 21:33 ` john stultz
2010-11-12  9:43   ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-12  9:57   ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2010-11-12 10:08     ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-12 10:31       ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-11-12 10:37         ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-12 11:08           ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-11-12 19:18           ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-11-12 20:22           ` john stultz
2010-11-12 19:15     ` Nicolas Pitre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101112095739.GH18358@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox