From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 13:07:00 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: memblock: convert reserve_crashkernel() to
	use memblock
In-Reply-To: <07f23b6e32b1ee64287dc53803890052df6546f3.1289292124.git.mika.westerberg@iki.fi>
References: <cover.1289292124.git.mika.westerberg@iki.fi>
	<07f23b6e32b1ee64287dc53803890052df6546f3.1289292124.git.mika.westerberg@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <20101113130700.GA26105@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:06:13AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>  static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long long crash_size, crash_base;
> -	unsigned long long total_mem;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	total_mem = get_total_mem();
> -	ret = parse_crashkernel(boot_command_line, total_mem,
> +	/* this is necessary because of memblock_phys_mem_size() */
> +	memblock_analyze();

I think you need to check with the memblock people whether its legal to
call memblock_analyze() multiple times.  What do other arches do for
this?

Secondly, when paging_init() returns, bootmem has been initialized, and
memory taken from bootmem to feed the zone allocators.  This memory is
not registered back into memblock.  Allocations from memblock after
paging_init() has returned will lead to overlaps with bootmem, and
therefore corruption.

So, this code is better off left as-is, rather than trying to convert it
to what mistakenly appears "the latest thing".