From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/11] ARM: imx: Add reset routine for i.MX28
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:36:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101115163646.GK8942@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289831795-4373-4-git-send-email-shawn.guo@freescale.com>
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:36:27PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> 1. The wdog reset is implemented in RTC block on MX28.
> 2. Implement the common reset routine for most blocks on MX28,
> so that the blocks can call it to get a software reset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-mxc/system.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/system.c b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/system.c
> index c3972c5..257b426 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/system.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/system.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> /*
> * Copyright (C) 1999 ARM Limited
> * Copyright (C) 2000 Deep Blue Solutions Ltd
> - * Copyright 2006-2007 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> + * Copyright 2006-2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> * Copyright 2008 Juergen Beisert, kernel at pengutronix.de
> * Copyright 2009 Ilya Yanok, Emcraft Systems Ltd, yanok at emcraft.com
> *
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ static void __iomem *wdog_base;
> void arch_reset(char mode, const char *cmd)
> {
> unsigned int wcr_enable;
> + struct clk *clk;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_MXC91231
> if (cpu_is_mxc91231()) {
> @@ -52,9 +53,18 @@ void arch_reset(char mode, const char *cmd)
>
> if (cpu_is_mx1()) {
> wcr_enable = (1 << 0);
> - } else {
> - struct clk *clk;
> + } else if (cpu_is_mx28()) {
> + clk = clk_get_sys("rtc", NULL);
> + if (!IS_ERR(clk))
> + clk_enable(clk);
>
> + /* set wdog count */
> + __raw_writel(1, wdog_base + 0x50);
> + /* wdog enbable bit */
s/enbable/enable/
> + wcr_enable = (1 << 4);
> + /* shift to SET address */
> + wdog_base += 0x4;
> + } else {
> clk = clk_get_sys("imx-wdt.0", NULL);
> if (!IS_ERR(clk))
> clk_enable(clk);
> @@ -80,3 +90,91 @@ void mxc_arch_reset_init(void __iomem *base)
> {
> wdog_base = base;
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_MX28
> +int mxc_reset_block(void __iomem *reg_addr)
> +{
> + u32 reg;
> + int timeout;
> +
> + /*
> + * The process of software reset of IP block is done
> + * in several steps:
> + *
> + * 1) clear SFTRST and wait it cleared;
> + * 2) clear CLKGATE, set SFTRST, wait CLKGATE set;
> + * 3) clear SFTRST and wait it cleared;
> + * 4) clear CLKGATE and wait it cleared.
> + */
> +
> + /* Clear SFTRST */
> + reg = __raw_readl(reg_addr);
> + reg &= ~(1 << 31);
> + __raw_writel(reg, reg_addr);
> + /* Wait SFTRST cleared */
> + timeout = 1000;
> + do {
> + mdelay(1);
> + if ((__raw_readl(reg_addr) & (1 << 31)) == 0)
> + break;
> + } while (--timeout > 0);
Does the mdelay make sence here?
> + if (timeout <= 0) {
> + pr_err("%s(%p): clear SFTRST timeout\n", __func__, reg_addr);
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> +
> + /* Clear CLKGATE */
> + reg = __raw_readl(reg_addr);
> + reg &= ~(1 << 30);
> + __raw_writel(reg, reg_addr);
> + /* Set SFTRST to reset the block */
> + reg = __raw_readl(reg_addr);
> + reg |= (1 << 31);
Can we have #defines here instead of constants?
> + __raw_writel(reg, reg_addr);
> + /* Poll CLKGATE set */
> + timeout = 1000;
> + do {
> + mdelay(1);
> + if (__raw_readl(reg_addr) & (1 << 30))
> + break;
> + } while (--timeout > 0);
> + if (timeout <= 0) {
> + pr_err("%s(%p): poll CLKGATE timeout\n", __func__, reg_addr);
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> +
> + /* Clear SFTRST */
> + reg = __raw_readl(reg_addr);
> + reg &= ~(1 << 31);
> + __raw_writel(reg, reg_addr);
> + /* Wait SFTRST cleared */
> + timeout = 1000;
> + do {
> + mdelay(1);
> + if ((__raw_readl(reg_addr) & (1 << 31)) == 0)
> + break;
> + } while (--timeout > 0);
> + if (timeout <= 0) {
> + pr_err("%s(%p): clear SFTRST timeout\n", __func__, reg_addr);
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> +
> + /* Clear CLKGATE */
> + reg = __raw_readl(reg_addr);
> + reg &= ~(1 << 30);
> + __raw_writel(reg, reg_addr);
> + /* Wait CLKGATE cleared */
> + timeout = 1000;
> + do {
> + mdelay(1);
> + if ((__raw_readl(reg_addr) & (1 << 30)) == 0)
> + break;
> + } while (--timeout > 0);
> + if (timeout <= 0) {
> + pr_err("%s(%p): clear CLKGATE timeout\n", __func__, reg_addr);
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> --
> 1.7.1
>
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-15 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-15 14:36 [RFC][PATCH 00/11] ARM: imx: Add initial i.MX28 support Shawn Guo
2010-11-15 14:36 ` [PATCH 01/11] ARM: imx: Add basic definitions for i.MX28 Shawn Guo
2010-11-15 16:25 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-11-15 14:36 ` [PATCH 02/11] ARM: imx: Add support of interrupt controller ICOLL Shawn Guo
2010-11-15 16:33 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-11-15 14:36 ` [PATCH 03/11] ARM: imx: Add reset routine for i.MX28 Shawn Guo
2010-11-15 16:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2010-11-17 11:17 ` Shawn Guo
2010-11-17 13:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-11-15 14:36 ` [PATCH 04/11] ARM: imx: Add timer support " Shawn Guo
2010-11-15 16:40 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-11-15 14:36 ` [PATCH 05/11] ARM: imx: Add GPIO " Shawn Guo
2010-11-15 16:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-11-15 14:36 ` [PATCH 06/11] ARM: imx: Add IOMUX " Shawn Guo
2010-11-15 16:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-11-15 14:36 ` [PATCH 07/11] ARM: imx: Add support of uncompress print " Shawn Guo
2010-11-15 16:47 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-11-15 14:36 ` [PATCH 08/11] ARM: imx: Add clock support " Shawn Guo
2010-11-15 14:36 ` [PATCH 09/11] ARM: imx: Add memory map " Shawn Guo
2010-11-15 14:36 ` [PATCH 10/11] ARM: imx: Add initial support of machine mx28evk Shawn Guo
2010-11-15 16:54 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-11-15 14:36 ` [PATCH 11/11] ARM: imx: Add i.MX28 support into Kconfig and Makefile Shawn Guo
2010-11-15 17:01 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-11-16 10:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/11] ARM: imx: Add initial i.MX28 support Sascha Hauer
2010-11-16 12:42 ` Shawn Guo
2010-11-16 17:24 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-11-17 1:28 ` Shawn Guo
2010-11-17 6:06 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101115163646.GK8942@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).