From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] mx51: Add mx51 processor to the pwm driver
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:50:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101116195032.GU8942@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <766471.7361.qm@web51008.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:36:35AM -0800, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-mxc/pwm.c |? ? 8 +++++---
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/pwm.c b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/pwm.c
> index c36f263..c6cdced 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/pwm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/pwm.c
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
> #define MX1_PWMP? ? 0x08???/* PWM Period Register */
>
>
> -/* i.MX27, i.MX31, i.MX35 share the same PWM function block: */
> +/* i.MX25/27/31/35/51 share the same PWM function block: */
If this is correct, ...
>
> #define MX3_PWMCR? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???0x00? ? /* PWM Control Register */
> #define MX3_PWMSAR? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0x0C? ? /* PWM Sample Register */
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns)
> ??? if (pwm == NULL || period_ns == 0 || duty_ns > period_ns)
> ??? ??? return -EINVAL;
>
> -??? if (cpu_is_mx27() || cpu_is_mx3() || cpu_is_mx25()) {
> +??? if (cpu_is_mx27() || cpu_is_mx3() || cpu_is_mx25() || cpu_is_mx51()) {
> ??? ??? unsigned long long c;
> ??? ??? unsigned long period_cycles, duty_cycles, prescale;
> ??? ??? u32 cr;
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns)
>
> ??? ??? cr = MX3_PWMCR_PRESCALER(prescale) | MX3_PWMCR_EN;
>
> -??? ??? if (cpu_is_mx25())
> +??? ??? if (cpu_is_mx25() || cpu_is_mx51())
I wonder why mx27 and mx3 are missing here.
> ??? ??? ??? cr |= MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG;
> ??? ??? else
> ??? ??? ??? cr |= MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG_HIGH;
> @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ static int __devinit mxc_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> ??? if (IS_ERR(pwm->clk)) {
> ??? ??? ret = PTR_ERR(pwm->clk);
> +??? ??? dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't get PWM clock\n");
> ??? ??? goto err_free;
> ??? }
>
> @@ -233,6 +234,7 @@ static int __devinit mxc_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ??? mutex_unlock(&pwm_lock);
>
> ??? platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pwm);
> +??? dev_info(&pdev->dev, "i.MX PWM Driver Enabled\n");
> ??? return 0;
>
> err_free_mem:
Some general comments for this driver:
- should move to drivers/something
- IMHO should use platform ids to get rid of the cpu_is_ stuff
(And BTW, you forgot to use --thread making your mails being spread in
(at least my) lakml folder.)
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-16 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-16 18:36 [PATCH 3/5] mx51: Add mx51 processor to the pwm driver Fabio Estevam
2010-11-16 19:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2010-11-18 10:15 ` Sascha Hauer
2010-11-18 12:04 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101116195032.GU8942@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).