* [PATCH v2] Add call to non-crashing cores through IPI
@ 2010-11-24 8:28 Per Fransson
2010-11-25 8:51 ` Mika Westerberg
2010-11-26 4:06 ` Olof Johansson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Per Fransson @ 2010-11-24 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
v2 changes:
* the interrupts of the calling core are no longer disabled
before performing the IPI
---
When kexec is used to start a crash kernel the other cores
are notified. These non-crashing cores will save their state
in the crash notes and then do nothing.
Signed-off-by: Per Fransson <per.xx.fransson@stericsson.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c
index 3a8fd51..57a7f2f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ extern unsigned long kexec_indirection_page;
extern unsigned long kexec_mach_type;
extern unsigned long kexec_boot_atags;
+static atomic_t waiting_for_crash_ipi;
+
/*
* Provide a dummy crash_notes definition while crash dump arrives to arm.
* This prevents breakage of crash_notes attribute in kernel/ksysfs.c.
@@ -37,9 +39,34 @@ void machine_kexec_cleanup(struct kimage *image)
{
}
+void machine_crash_nonpanic_core(void *unused)
+{
+ struct pt_regs regs;
+
+ crash_setup_regs(®s, NULL);
+ printk(KERN_EMERG "CPU %u will stop doing anything useful since another CPU has crashed\n",
+ smp_processor_id());
+ crash_save_cpu(®s, smp_processor_id());
+ flush_cache_all();
+
+ atomic_dec(&waiting_for_crash_ipi);
+ while (1)
+ cpu_relax();
+}
+
void machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ unsigned long msecs;
+
local_irq_disable();
+
+ atomic_set(&waiting_for_crash_ipi, num_online_cpus() - 1);
+ smp_call_function(machine_crash_nonpanic_core, NULL, false);
+ msecs = 1000; /* Wait at most a second for the other cpus to stop */
+ while ((atomic_read(&waiting_for_crash_ipi) > 0) && msecs) {
+ mdelay(1);
+ msecs--;
+ }
crash_save_cpu(regs, smp_processor_id());
printk(KERN_INFO "Loading crashdump kernel...\n");
--
1.7.2.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] Add call to non-crashing cores through IPI
2010-11-24 8:28 [PATCH v2] Add call to non-crashing cores through IPI Per Fransson
@ 2010-11-25 8:51 ` Mika Westerberg
2010-11-26 4:06 ` Olof Johansson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mika Westerberg @ 2010-11-25 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:28:28AM +0100, Per Fransson wrote:
> v2 changes:
> * the interrupts of the calling core are no longer disabled
> before performing the IPI
This version information should go after the commit message below
the '---' line.
> ---
>
> When kexec is used to start a crash kernel the other cores
> are notified. These non-crashing cores will save their state
> in the crash notes and then do nothing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Per Fransson <per.xx.fransson@stericsson.com>
I tested this on UP machine (I don't have access to any SMP hardware) -
it didn't break anything and the crashdump works perfectly.
Regards,
MW
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] Add call to non-crashing cores through IPI
2010-11-24 8:28 [PATCH v2] Add call to non-crashing cores through IPI Per Fransson
2010-11-25 8:51 ` Mika Westerberg
@ 2010-11-26 4:06 ` Olof Johansson
2010-11-29 12:46 ` Per Fransson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Olof Johansson @ 2010-11-26 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi,
Just a couple of nitpicks below. It's also common to prefix the patch
subject with the subsystem (i.e. "ARM: kexec: ...")
-Olof
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:28:28AM +0100, Per Fransson wrote:
> v2 changes:
> * the interrupts of the calling core are no longer disabled
> before performing the IPI
> ---
>
> When kexec is used to start a crash kernel the other cores
> are notified. These non-crashing cores will save their state
> in the crash notes and then do nothing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Per Fransson <per.xx.fransson@stericsson.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> index 3a8fd51..57a7f2f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ extern unsigned long kexec_indirection_page;
> extern unsigned long kexec_mach_type;
> extern unsigned long kexec_boot_atags;
>
> +static atomic_t waiting_for_crash_ipi;
> +
> /*
> * Provide a dummy crash_notes definition while crash dump arrives to arm.
> * This prevents breakage of crash_notes attribute in kernel/ksysfs.c.
> @@ -37,9 +39,34 @@ void machine_kexec_cleanup(struct kimage *image)
> {
> }
>
> +void machine_crash_nonpanic_core(void *unused)
> +{
> + struct pt_regs regs;
> +
> + crash_setup_regs(®s, NULL);
> + printk(KERN_EMERG "CPU %u will stop doing anything useful since another CPU has crashed\n",
> + smp_processor_id());
No other architecture has verbose output like this. Maybe lower it to
KERN_DEBUG if you feel it's needed on a production kernel?
> + crash_save_cpu(®s, smp_processor_id());
> + flush_cache_all();
> +
> + atomic_dec(&waiting_for_crash_ipi);
> + while (1)
> + cpu_relax();
> +}
> +
> void machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> + unsigned long msecs;
Int should be enough here? Not that it makes a difference on ARM, but
anyway. :)
> +
> local_irq_disable();
> +
> + atomic_set(&waiting_for_crash_ipi, num_online_cpus() - 1);
> + smp_call_function(machine_crash_nonpanic_core, NULL, false);
> + msecs = 1000; /* Wait at most a second for the other cpus to stop */
> + while ((atomic_read(&waiting_for_crash_ipi) > 0) && msecs) {
> + mdelay(1);
> + msecs--;
> + }
If anything, logging here if not all cpus were stopped would be more
useful.
> crash_save_cpu(regs, smp_processor_id());
>
> printk(KERN_INFO "Loading crashdump kernel...\n");
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] Add call to non-crashing cores through IPI
2010-11-26 4:06 ` Olof Johansson
@ 2010-11-29 12:46 ` Per Fransson
2010-11-29 17:47 ` Olof Johansson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Per Fransson @ 2010-11-29 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
>> ?void machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> ?{
>> + ? ? unsigned long msecs;
>
> Int should be enough here? Not that it makes a difference on ARM, but
> anyway. :)
>
>> +
>> ? ? ? local_irq_disable();
>> +
>> + ? ? atomic_set(&waiting_for_crash_ipi, num_online_cpus() - 1);
>> + ? ? smp_call_function(machine_crash_nonpanic_core, NULL, false);
>> + ? ? msecs = 1000; /* Wait at most a second for the other cpus to stop */
>> + ? ? while ((atomic_read(&waiting_for_crash_ipi) > 0) && msecs) {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? mdelay(1);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? msecs--;
>> + ? ? }
The choice of type comes from the corresponding x86 code in
arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c:nmi_shootdown_cpus()
Should we deviate?
Regards,
Per
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] Add call to non-crashing cores through IPI
2010-11-29 12:46 ` Per Fransson
@ 2010-11-29 17:47 ` Olof Johansson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Olof Johansson @ 2010-11-29 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:46:26PM +0100, Per Fransson wrote:
> >> ?void machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >> ?{
> >> + ? ? unsigned long msecs;
> >
> > Int should be enough here? Not that it makes a difference on ARM, but
> > anyway. :)
> >
> >> +
> >> ? ? ? local_irq_disable();
> >> +
> >> + ? ? atomic_set(&waiting_for_crash_ipi, num_online_cpus() - 1);
> >> + ? ? smp_call_function(machine_crash_nonpanic_core, NULL, false);
> >> + ? ? msecs = 1000; /* Wait at most a second for the other cpus to stop */
> >> + ? ? while ((atomic_read(&waiting_for_crash_ipi) > 0) && msecs) {
> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? mdelay(1);
> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? msecs--;
> >> + ? ? }
>
> The choice of type comes from the corresponding x86 code in
>
> arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c:nmi_shootdown_cpus()
>
> Should we deviate?
We've already spent more time discussing this than it's worth. :-)
Leave it if you prefer.
-Olof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-29 17:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-24 8:28 [PATCH v2] Add call to non-crashing cores through IPI Per Fransson
2010-11-25 8:51 ` Mika Westerberg
2010-11-26 4:06 ` Olof Johansson
2010-11-29 12:46 ` Per Fransson
2010-11-29 17:47 ` Olof Johansson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).