[PATCH v3] ARM: s3c2442: Setup gpio {set,get}_pull callbacks

[anarsoul@gmail.com (Vasily Khoruzhick)]

On Monday 08 November 2010 22:26:23 Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> Currently the {set,get}_pull callbacks of the s3c24xx_gpiocfg_default
> structure are initalized via s3c_gpio_{get,set}pull_1up. This results in a
> linker error when compiling kernel for s3c2442:
> 
> arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/built-in.o:(.data+0x13f4): undefined reference to
> `s3c_gpio_getpull_1up'
> arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/built-in.o:(.data+0x13f8): undefined reference to
> `s3c_gpio_setpull_1up'
> 
> The s3c2442 has pulldowns instead of pullups compared to the s3c2440.
> The method of controlling them is the same though.
> So this patch modifies the existing s3c_gpio_{get,set}pull_1up helper
> functions to take an additional parameter deciding whether the pin has a
> pullup or pulldown. The s3c_gpio_{get,set}pull_1{down,up} functions then
> wrap that functions passing either S3C_GPIO_PULL_UP or S3C_GPIO_PULL_DOWN.
> 
> Furthermore this patch sets up the s3c24xx_gpiocfg_default.{get,set}_pull
> fields in the s3c2442 cpu init function to the new pulldown helper
> functions.
> 
> Based on patch from "Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>

Hi there,

Can any samsung-soc maintainer review/merge this patch?

I should admit that merging patches through samsung maintainers became pretty 
impossible - response latency is about 1 month, some patches (not mine) are 
still pending. I've sent first version of this patch on 6th of November, few 
weeks of standby - and we'll get 2.6.37 with broken s3c2442 support. Yeah, I 
know that maintainers are living people too, and they need to pay attention to 
real life, work, family, etc, but now merging some samsung-soc-related patch 
is really painfull and slow proccess, and it would be nice if it could be 
somehow improved.

Regards
Vasily