From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 14:33:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 09/15] ARM: mxs: Add clock support In-Reply-To: References: <1290754154-9428-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@freescale.com> <1290754154-9428-10-git-send-email-shawn.guo@freescale.com> <20101130163922.GT20449@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20101207133322.GH21020@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello Shawn, > > Hmm, I would have used an approach that is quickly switchable to the > > generic clock stuff posted a few times here. ?But probably already too > > late. ?So it's up to you to decide when to switch (or if at all). > > > I suppose you are talking about the common struct clk patch from > Jeremy Kerr. Since mxs is closely tracking mxc, I would switch mxs > only mxc is switched. I want mxc switched sooner rather than later. If you ask me, don't stop to be inovative because of tracking mxc which supports many machines and so isn't that flexible as a new machine support. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |