From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [BUG] 2.6.37-rc3 massive interactivity regression on ARM
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:55:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101208125548.GA9777@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291812015.28378.24.camel@laptop>
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:40:15PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 16:21 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure that's the correct fix - it looks like sched_clock_cpu()
> > should already be preventing scheduler clock time going backwards.
> >
> > Hmm. IOP32x seems to have a 32-bit timer clocked at 200MHz. That means
> > it wraps once every 21s. However, we have that converted to ns by an
> > unknown multiplier and shift. It seems that those are chosen to
> > guarantee that we will cover only 4s without wrapping in the clocksource
> > conversion. Maybe that's not sufficient?
> >
> > Could you try looking into sched_clock_cpu(), sched_clock_local() and
> > sched_clock() to see whether anything odd stands out?
>
> # git grep HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK arch/arm | wc -l
> 0
Hmm, you're right. In which case it's purely down to sched_clock()
only being able to cover 4s - which seems to be far too small a gap.
I'm not sure that the unstable sched clock stuff makes much sense to
be enabled - we don't have an unstable clock, we just don't have the
required number of bits for the scheduler to work correctly.
Nevertheless, this provides a good way to find this kind of wrap bug.
Even with cnt_32_to_63, we still don't get a 64-bit sched_clock(), so
this bug will still be there. Even with a 64-bit clock, the bug will
still be there. It's basically crap code.
Maybe it's better that on ARM, we just don't implement sched_clock()
at all?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-08 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-27 15:16 [BUG] 2.6.37-rc3 massive interactivity regression on ARM Mikael Pettersson
2010-12-05 12:32 ` Mikael Pettersson
2010-12-05 13:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-05 14:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-05 16:07 ` Mikael Pettersson
2010-12-05 16:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-08 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 12:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-12-08 14:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 14:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-08 14:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 15:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-08 15:43 ` Linus Walleij
2010-12-08 20:42 ` john stultz
2010-12-08 23:31 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-09 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-09 17:43 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-09 17:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-09 18:11 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-09 18:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-09 22:21 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-09 23:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-09 23:35 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-10 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 13:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 13:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 16:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-10 16:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 17:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-10 17:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 18:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-10 18:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-10 18:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 19:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-10 20:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 20:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-10 20:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 20:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-10 20:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-10 21:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-10 21:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-10 21:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-10 17:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-10 18:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 18:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 19:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-10 19:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 19:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-13 14:33 ` Jack Daniel
2010-12-06 21:29 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101208125548.GA9777@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).