From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:10:13 +0000
Subject: [RFC PATCH 02/13] picoxcell: add support for AXI bus snoopers
In-Reply-To: <1290506774-17895-3-git-send-email-jamie@jamieiles.com>
References: <1290506774-17895-1-git-send-email-jamie@jamieiles.com>
	<1290506774-17895-3-git-send-email-jamie@jamieiles.com>
Message-ID: <20101208161013.GL9777@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:06:03AM +0000, Jamie Iles wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/picoxcell_core.c b/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/picoxcell_core.c
> index 4469a78..07eaa9b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/picoxcell_core.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/picoxcell_core.c
> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ static ssize_t part_show(struct sys_device *sysdev,
>  			 struct sysdev_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>  {
>  	const char *part = picoxcell_get_partname();
> +
>  	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", part);
>  }

Shouldn't this be in the first patch?