From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] ARM: mx5: use config to define boot related addresses
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:00:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101209090052.GT9777@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101209085255.GS17441@pengutronix.de>
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 09:52:55AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> Hell Russell,
>
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:44:30AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:04:11AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot
> > > > index 9939a19..388d2e8 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot
> > > > @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
> > > > - zreladdr-y := 0x90008000
> > > > -params_phys-y := 0x90000100
> > > > -initrd_phys-y := 0x90800000
> > > > + zreladdr-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX51) := 0x90008000
> > > > +params_phys-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX51) := 0x90000100
> > > > +initrd_phys-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX51) := 0x90800000
> > > That is one of the places that is not multi-soc capable. You can make
> > > it 66% less worse by just removing params_phys and initrd_phys.
> >
> > Which then destroys the ability to use the bootp veneer which combines
> > a kernel and initrd.
> I am aware of that. I think it's OK to add the assignments when they
> are needed the first time which I don't expect to happen soon if at all.
That depends who is trying to use it. If it's someone who isn't the
original platform developer, they may give up with it if the definitions
aren't provided.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-09 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-09 14:08 [PATCH 1/6] ARM: mx5: use config to define boot related addresses Richard Zhao
2010-12-09 7:04 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-09 7:28 ` Richard Zhao
2010-12-09 8:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-09 8:52 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-09 9:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-12-10 5:21 ` Richard Zhao
2010-12-10 8:00 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-09 14:08 ` [PATCH 2/6] arm: plat-mxc: add full parameter macro to define gpio port Richard Zhao
2010-12-09 7:12 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-09 14:08 ` [PATCH 3/6] arm: mx51: define mx51's own MXC_GPIO_IRQS Richard Zhao
2010-12-09 14:08 ` [PATCH 4/6] arm: mx5: always use __mxc_cpu_type to check cpu type Richard Zhao
2010-12-09 7:10 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-09 7:52 ` Richard Zhao
2010-12-09 8:31 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-09 14:08 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm: mx50: add core functions support Richard Zhao
2010-12-09 8:25 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-10 7:08 ` Richard Zhao
2010-12-10 8:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-10 9:30 ` Richard Zhao
2010-12-10 10:56 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-10 12:51 ` Richard Zhao
2010-12-09 9:02 ` Sascha Hauer
2010-12-10 8:03 ` Richard Zhao
2010-12-09 14:08 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm: mx50: add mx50 reference design board support Richard Zhao
2010-12-09 8:29 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-09 8:51 ` Richard Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101209090052.GT9777@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).