From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:50:21 +0000 Subject: [BUG] 2.6.37-rc3 massive interactivity regression on ARM In-Reply-To: <1291988866.6803.171.camel@twins> References: <1291917330.6803.7.camel@twins> <1291920939.6803.38.camel@twins> <1291936593.13513.3.camel@laptop> <1291975704.6803.59.camel@twins> <1291987065.6803.151.camel@twins> <1291987635.6803.161.camel@twins> <1291988866.6803.171.camel@twins> Message-ID: <20101210165021.GA28263@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 02:47:46PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Full patch.. > > --- > Subject: sched: Fix the irqtime code to deal with u64 wraps > From: Peter Zijlstra > Date: Thu Dec 09 14:15:34 CET 2010 > > ARM systems have a 32bit sched_clock() [ which needs to be fixed ], > but this exposed a bug in the irq_time code as well, it doesn't deal > with wraps at all. > > Fix the irq_time code to deal with u64 wraps by re-writing the code to > only use delta increments, which avoids the whole issue. > > Furthermore, solve the problem of 32bit arches reading partial updates > of the u64 time values. > > Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi > Reported-by: Russell King - ARM Linux I think credit should go to Mikael Pettersson, who identified the interactivity regression and problematical commit. I only pointed out the dubious nature of the code.