[GIT PULL] OMAP: mailbox and iommu changes: for-next for v2.6.38

[linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)]

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 05:02:12PM -0600, Guzman Lugo, Fernando wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Kanigeri, Hari <h-kanigeri2@ti.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> > <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 09:16:23AM -0600, Kanigeri, Hari wrote:
> >>> Ruseell,
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
> >>> <fernando.lugo@ti.com> wrote:
> >>> > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> >>> > <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >>> >> On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 08:50:07AM -0600, Guzman Lugo, Fernando wrote:
> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> >>> >>> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >>> >>> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 06:07:23AM -0600, Kanigeri, Hari wrote:
> >>> >>> >> Hi Tony,
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >> The following changes since commit e8a7e48bb248a1196484d3f8afa53bded2b24e71:
> >>> >>> >> ? Linus Torvalds (1):
> >>> >>> >> ? ? ? ? Linux 2.6.37-rc4
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >> ? git://gitorious.org/iommu_mailbox/iommu_mailbox.git for_2.6.38
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >> Fernando Guzman Lugo (5):
> >>> >>> >> ? ? ? OMAP: mailbox: change full flag per mailbox queue instead of global
> >>> >>> >> ? ? ? omap: iovmm - no gap checking for fixed address
> >>> >>> >> ? ? ? omap: iovmm - add superpages support to fixed da address
> >>> >>> >> ? ? ? omap: iovmm - replace __iounmap with omap_iounmap
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > This change is wrong. ?Nothing should be directly referencing omap_iounmap
> >>> >>> > nor for that matter omap_ioremap. ?Both are implementation details of the
> >>> >>> > standard ioremap/iounmap APIs.
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > Use the official APIs rather than the implementation details behind them.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> if you see where the function is used, you will see that it is not
> >>> >>> calling the function, it is use as a parameter in unmap_vm_area(), if
> >>> >>> I used iounmap which is a macro there I will get a compilation error.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Hmm, yes, because iounmap() is defined as a macro rather than iounmap.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> The solution to this is to fix iounmap and __arch_iounmap macros so
> >>> >> they aren't macros which take arguments. ?That will then allow them
> >>> >> to be used in the way you desire.
> >>> >
> >>> > yes, that way it can be used in the function parameter. what is the
> >>> > right thing to do?
> >>> > 1) You send your patch and then I send the new version of the patches.
> >>> > 2) I make a new series of the patches with the change to iounmap and I
> >>> > include your patch in the series.
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> Can you please suggest the approach we take here ? So, either you send
> >>> your suggested change as a patch and Fernando's patch will be based on
> >>> it, or he can take a TODO action item to patch again if you plan to
> >>> send this change later.
> >>
> >> Right, the patches are in my git tree, under the 'io' branch:
> >>
> >> ?http://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/kernel/git-cur/linux-2.6-arm.git io
> 
> 
> I tried to clone it but after sometime it fails, I tried to used
> git:// but it did not work and know behind a http proxy it is getting
> "The requested URL returned error: 500" do someone know if I need
> something special to clone it?

Sigh.

Someone has helpfully upgraded apache on the machine at about 8pm, but
failed to check that it was running afterwards (it's now midnight.)

I've just restarted it, so it should work now.