linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lethal@linux-sh.org (Paul Mundt)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/03] ARM: mach-shmobile: Initial SMP support
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:57:03 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101214095703.GG14606@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101214075647.11275.25933.sendpatchset@t400s>

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 04:56:47PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> ARM: mach-shmobile: Initial SMP support
> 
> [PATCH 01/03] ARM: mach-shmobile: SMP base support 
> [PATCH 02/03] ARM: mach-shmobile: Enable SMP support
> [PATCH 03/03] ARM: mach-shmobile: sh73a0 SMP support
> 
> These patches add SMP framework support for R-Mobile and
> SH-Mobile processors, together with hardware specific SMP
> support for the sh73a0 processor.
> 
> Survives onlining and offlining of secondary processor cores
> through sysfs. Should compile and boot regardless of 
> CONFIG_SMP, CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU and CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMERS.
> 
> I suggest that patch 1 and 3 are taken through sh-2.6 and
> patch 2 goes through the RMK patch tracker.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>

Applied to rmobile/smp, thanks.

There are integration issues with regards to the GIC changes that I'll
have to take care of during the merge window regardless, so resolving the
CONFIG_SMP thing at that point should be pretty straightforward. My plan
is to wait until after Russell merges, merge your stuff on top of that,
and then send the updated bits to Linus in one shot.

In order to avoid clashes with -next for now however I won't be merging
the topic branch in to my -latest branch. Given that the number of boards
in the wild for this at the moment are in the single digits, I'm not too
worried about the amount of time these changes spend in -next so long as
no regressions are introduced for the other boards.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-14  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-14  7:56 [PATCH 00/03] ARM: mach-shmobile: Initial SMP support Magnus Damm
2010-12-14  7:56 ` [PATCH 01/03] ARM: mach-shmobile: SMP base support Magnus Damm
2010-12-17  8:42   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-17 11:39     ` Magnus Damm
2010-12-14  7:57 ` [PATCH 02/03] ARM: mach-shmobile: Enable SMP support Magnus Damm
2010-12-14  7:57 ` [PATCH 03/03] ARM: mach-shmobile: sh73a0 " Magnus Damm
2010-12-14  9:57 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2011-01-07  1:51   ` [PATCH 00/03] ARM: mach-shmobile: Initial " Paul Mundt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101214095703.GG14606@linux-sh.org \
    --to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).