From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:36:24 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] OMAP4: Pandaboard: Add omap_reserve functionality
In-Reply-To: <20101218172055.GT5941@atomide.com>
References: <20101218030406.10251.73118.stgit@baageli.muru.com>
	<20101218030521.10251.89993.stgit@baageli.muru.com>
	<20101218082703.GB3047@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20101218172055.GT5941@atomide.com>
Message-ID: <20101218173624.GD3047@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 09:20:56AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [101218 00:26]:
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 07:05:21PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >  	/* Maintainer: David Anders - Texas Instruments Inc */
> > >  	.boot_params	= 0x80000100,
> > >  	.map_io		= omap4_panda_map_io,
> > > +	.reserve	= omap_reserve,
> > 
> > Please put .reserve before .map_io.
> 
> Hmm, that's the way it should be.. But we should also correct the
> earlier changes too?

Strangely that's what I've been doing in my init_early patches.  My
comment was aimed to ensure that no new instances are introduced.