From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] OMAP4: hwmod data: Fix SR flags, structures order and field alignment
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:46:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101223204608.GR7771@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1293113700-24309-1-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com>
* Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> [101223 06:14]:
> Smartreflex is missing the recently introduced SIDLE_SMART_WKUP
> flag in idlemodes field.
So this actually also changes something too?
> The merge of the DMA and SR series on top of the already modified
> omap_hwmod_data_44xx.c moved the dma_system structure at the wrong
> position in the file. The same thing happened for the SR structure.
> - Re-order the structures properly.
>
> In order to be fully aligned with the Python generator output,
> change a couple of fields.
> - Add tab in class and dev_attr structures to align fields
> - Add a comma at the end of the following line to simplify the
> code generation:
> ".pre_shutdown = &omap2_wd_timer_disable,"
To me it sounds like this should be at least two separate patches:
One that adds the SIDLE_SMART_WKUP, then another patch that
only does clean-up with no functional changes.
Also this patch applied (contactenated multiple patches?) turns
into a hard to read interleaved patch for some parts:
-static struct omap_hwmod_irq_info omap44xx_uart2_irqs[] = {
- { .irq = 73 + OMAP44XX_IRQ_GIC_START },
-};
-
-static struct omap_hwmod_dma_info omap44xx_uart2_sdma_reqs[] = {
- { .name = "tx", .dma_req = 50 + OMAP44XX_DMA_REQ_START },
- { .name = "rx", .dma_req = 51 + OMAP44XX_DMA_REQ_START },
+/* smartreflex_iva */
+static struct omap_hwmod omap44xx_smartreflex_iva_hwmod;
+static struct omap_hwmod_irq_info omap44xx_smartreflex_iva_irqs[] = {
+ { .irq = 102 + OMAP44XX_IRQ_GIC_START },
};
-static struct omap_hwmod_addr_space omap44xx_uart2_addrs[] = {
+static struct omap_hwmod_addr_space omap44xx_smartreflex_iva_addrs[] = {
{
- .pa_start = 0x4806c000,
- .pa_end = 0x4806c0ff,
+ .pa_start = 0x4a0db000,
+ .pa_end = 0x4a0db03f,
.flags = ADDR_TYPE_RT
},
};
...
So sounds like your original three patches would be the better
way to go.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-23 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-23 14:15 [PATCH] OMAP4: hwmod data: Fix SR flags, structures order and field alignment Benoit Cousson
2010-12-23 17:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-12-23 20:46 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2010-12-23 22:24 ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-12-23 23:40 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101223204608.GR7771@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).