From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM i.MX53: Some bug fix about MX53 MSL code
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:54:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101230095401.GW14221@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1293686881-15046-2-git-send-email-yong.shen@freescale.com>
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 01:28:00PM +0800, yong.shen at freescale.com wrote:
> From: Yong Shen <yong.shen@linaro.org>
>
> 1. pll_base address should return right value
> 2. uart parent clk is from pll3
> 3. add cpu_is_mx53 definition
>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Shen <yong.shen@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51-mx53.c | 7 ++++---
> arch/arm/mach-mx5/crm_regs.h | 4 ++++
> arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mxc.h | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51-mx53.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51-mx53.c
> index 9fc65bb..6db69db 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51-mx53.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51-mx53.c
> @@ -127,11 +127,11 @@ static inline u32 _get_mux(struct clk *parent, struct clk *m0,
> static inline void __iomem *_get_pll_base(struct clk *pll)
> {
> if (pll == &pll1_main_clk)
> - return MX51_DPLL1_BASE;
> + return cpu_is_mx51() ? MX51_DPLL1_BASE : MX53_DPLL1_BASE;
> else if (pll == &pll2_sw_clk)
> - return MX51_DPLL2_BASE;
> + return cpu_is_mx51() ? MX51_DPLL2_BASE : MX53_DPLL2_BASE;
> else if (pll == &pll3_sw_clk)
> - return MX51_DPLL3_BASE;
> + return cpu_is_mx51() ? MX51_DPLL3_BASE : MX53_DPLL3_BASE;
> else if (pll == &mx53_pll4_sw_clk)
> return MX53_DPLL4_BASE;
> else
hmmm, not nice. I assume Sascha won't take that.
> @@ -1202,6 +1202,7 @@ int __init mx53_clocks_init(unsigned long ckil, unsigned long osc,
>
> clk_tree_init();
>
> + clk_set_parent(&uart_root_clk, &pll3_sw_clk);
> clk_enable(&cpu_clk);
> clk_enable(&main_bus_clk);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/crm_regs.h b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/crm_regs.h
> index 51ff9bb..b462c22 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/crm_regs.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/crm_regs.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,10 @@
> #define MX51_GPC_BASE MX51_IO_ADDRESS(MX51_GPC_BASE_ADDR)
>
> /*MX53*/
> +#define MX53_CCM_BASE MX53_IO_ADDRESS(MX53_CCM_BASE_ADDR)
> +#define MX53_DPLL1_BASE MX53_IO_ADDRESS(MX53_PLL1_BASE_ADDR)
> +#define MX53_DPLL2_BASE MX53_IO_ADDRESS(MX53_PLL2_BASE_ADDR)
> +#define MX53_DPLL3_BASE MX53_IO_ADDRESS(MX53_PLL3_BASE_ADDR)
> #define MX53_DPLL4_BASE MX53_IO_ADDRESS(MX53_PLL3_BASE_ADDR)
>
> /* PLL Register Offsets */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mxc.h b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mxc.h
> index 4abbdd1..eca8f83 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mxc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mxc.h
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ extern unsigned int __mxc_cpu_type;
> # define cpu_is_mx35() (0)
> #endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_MX5
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_MX51
> # ifdef mxc_cpu_type
> # undef mxc_cpu_type
> # define mxc_cpu_type __mxc_cpu_type
> @@ -134,11 +134,22 @@ extern unsigned int __mxc_cpu_type;
> # define mxc_cpu_type MXC_CPU_MX51
> # endif
> # define cpu_is_mx51() (mxc_cpu_type == MXC_CPU_MX51)
> -# define cpu_is_mx53() (mxc_cpu_type == MXC_CPU_MX53)
> #else
> # define cpu_is_mx51() (0)
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_MX53
> +# ifdef mxc_cpu_type
> +# undef mxc_cpu_type
> +# define mxc_cpu_type __mxc_cpu_type
> +# else
> +# define mxc_cpu_type MXC_CPU_MX53
> +# endif
> +# define cpu_is_mx53() (mxc_cpu_type == MXC_CPU_MX53)
> +#else
> +# define cpu_is_mx53() (0)
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_MXC91231
> # ifdef mxc_cpu_type
> # undef mxc_cpu_type
This hunk is also included in one of Richard's patches for mx50.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-30 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-30 5:27 [PATCH v2] ARM i.MX53 MSL patch set yong.shen at freescale.com
2010-12-30 5:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM i.MX53: Some bug fix about MX53 MSL code yong.shen at freescale.com
2010-12-30 9:54 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2010-12-30 14:35 ` Richard Zhao
2010-12-31 2:31 ` Yong Shen
2010-12-31 16:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-30 5:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM i.MX53: Make MX53 EVK bootable yong.shen at freescale.com
2010-12-30 9:51 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-31 2:11 ` Yong Shen
2010-12-31 2:12 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101230095401.GW14221@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).