linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/8] ARM: mx5: use config to define boot related addresses
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 12:05:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101230110506.GY14221@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101230110026.GA30513@shlinux1.ap.freescale.net>

Hello Richard,

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 07:00:26PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:31:27AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:56:02PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@freescale.com>
> > > ---
> > > Because common clock is changing, I don't send out mx50 clock code.
> > > But sure I tested the patch series using the clock code.
> > > 
> > >  arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot |    6 +++---
> > >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot
> > > index 9939a19..fec7cd9 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot
> > > @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
> > > -   zreladdr-y	:= 0x90008000
> > > -params_phys-y	:= 0x90000100
> > > -initrd_phys-y	:= 0x90800000
> > > +   zreladdr-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX51)	:= 0x90008000
> > > +params_phys-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX51)	:= 0x90000100
> > > +initrd_phys-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX51)	:= 0x90800000
> > looks good
> > 
> > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Thanks.
> For such patch acked, do I need to re-send it out when I send out v4 version
> of the patch series?
As I'm not the imx-maintainer, I'd say yes, send it out (with my ack
added) in v4.

Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-30 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-30  4:56 [PATCH v3 1/8] ARM: mx5: use config to define boot related addresses Richard Zhao
2010-12-30  4:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] arm: plat-mxc: add full parameter macro to define gpio port Richard Zhao
2010-12-30  4:56   ` [PATCH v3 3/8] arm: mx51: define mx51's own MXC_GPIO_IRQS Richard Zhao
2010-12-30  4:56     ` [PATCH v3 4/8] arm: mx5: mx51/53 have different mxc_cpu_type definition Richard Zhao
2010-12-30  4:56       ` [PATCH v3 5/8] arm: mxc: move IOMUX_CONFIG_XXXX definitions to iomux-v3.h Richard Zhao
2010-12-30  4:56         ` [PATCH v3 6/8] arm: mx50: add core functions support except clock Richard Zhao
2010-12-30  4:56           ` [PATCH v3 7/8] arm: mx50: add mx50 reference design board support Richard Zhao
2010-12-30  9:46             ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-30 10:55               ` Richard Zhao
2010-12-30  9:29           ` [PATCH v3 6/8] arm: mx50: add core functions support except clock Richard Zhao
2010-12-30  9:40           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-30 10:40             ` Richard Zhao
2010-12-30  9:33         ` [PATCH v3 5/8] arm: mxc: move IOMUX_CONFIG_XXXX definitions to iomux-v3.h Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-30  9:33       ` [PATCH v3 4/8] arm: mx5: mx51/53 have different mxc_cpu_type definition Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-30  9:32     ` [PATCH v3 3/8] arm: mx51: define mx51's own MXC_GPIO_IRQS Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-30  9:31   ` [PATCH v3 2/8] arm: plat-mxc: add full parameter macro to define gpio port Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-30  9:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] ARM: mx5: use config to define boot related addresses Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-30 11:00   ` Richard Zhao
2010-12-30 11:05     ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2010-12-31  2:01       ` Shawn Guo
2010-12-31  2:48         ` Richard Zhao
2010-12-31 16:23         ` Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101230110506.GY14221@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).