From: npiggin@kernel.dk (Nick Piggin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] [ARM] Add missing include "asm/memory.h"
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 17:30:50 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110104063050.GE3402@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1293501397.32542.2.camel@mola>
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 09:56:37AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> This patch fixes below build error by adding the missing asm/memory.h,
> which is needed for arch_is_coherent().
This is the right approach, but needs to go through ARM tree.
> $ make pxa3xx_defconfig; make
> CC init/do_mounts_rd.o
> In file included from include/linux/list_bl.h:5,
> from include/linux/rculist_bl.h:7,
> from include/linux/dcache.h:7,
> from include/linux/fs.h:381,
> from init/do_mounts_rd.c:3:
> include/linux/bit_spinlock.h: In function 'bit_spin_unlock':
> include/linux/bit_spinlock.h:61: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_is_coherent'
> make[1]: *** [init/do_mounts_rd.o] Error 1
> make: *** [init] Error 2
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
> ---
> It was posted on https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/17/9 .
> I still have the build error for today's linux-next tree.
> CC Eric Miao, maybe he will take this patch.
>
> Axel
>
> arch/arm/include/asm/system.h | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h
> index ec4327a..3222ab8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h
> @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ extern unsigned int user_debug;
> #define rmb() dmb()
> #define wmb() mb()
> #else
> +#include <asm/memory.h>
> #define mb() do { if (arch_is_coherent()) dmb(); else barrier(); } while (0)
> #define rmb() do { if (arch_is_coherent()) dmb(); else barrier(); } while (0)
> #define wmb() do { if (arch_is_coherent()) dmb(); else barrier(); } while (0)
Is this matching ARM convention to pull includes down here. It
usually ends up with more elusive dependency problems and strange
bugs (eg. some headers define intermediate symbols for convenience
and then undef them sometime later etc etc). Usual thing to avoid
problems is to move includes up to the top.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-04 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-28 1:56 [PATCH RESEND] [ARM] Add missing include "asm/memory.h" Axel Lin
2011-01-02 23:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-03 1:28 ` Axel Lin
2011-01-04 6:30 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110104063050.GE3402@amd \
--to=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).