From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] hvc_dcc: Simplify assembly for v6 and v7 ARM
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 10:52:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110104185256.GD7771@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1012201644110.10437@xanadu.home>
* Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> [101220 13:44]:
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2010, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> > The inline assembly differences for v6 vs. v7 in the hvc_dcc
> > driver are purely optimizations. On a v7 processor, an mrc with
> > the pc sets the condition codes to the 28-31 bits of the register
> > being read. It just so happens that the TX/RX full bits the DCC
> > driver is testing for are high enough in the register to be put
> > into the condition codes. On a v6 processor, this "feature" isn't
> > implemented and thus we have to do the usual read, mask, test
> > operations to check for TX/RX full.
> >
> > Since we already test the RX/TX full bits before calling
> > __dcc_getchar() and __dcc_putchar() we don't actually need to do
> > anything special for v7 over v6. The only difference is in
> > hvc_dcc_get_chars(). We would test RX full, poll RX full, and
> > then read a character from the buffer, whereas now we will test
> > RX full, read a character from the buffer, and then test RX full
> > again for the second iteration of the loop. It doesn't seem
> > possible for the buffer to go from full to empty between testing
> > the RX full and reading a character. Therefore, replace the v7
> > versions with the v6 versions and everything works the same.
> >
> > Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-04 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20101201192856.GA731@suse.de>
2010-12-18 5:16 ` [PATCH] hvc_dcc: Simplify assembly for v6 and v7 ARM Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 17:51 ` Daniel Walker
2010-12-20 18:39 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 18:46 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-12-20 20:08 ` [PATCH 0/3] hvc_dcc cleanups and fixes Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 20:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] hvc_dcc: Fix bad code generation by marking assembly volatile Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 21:39 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-02 9:00 ` Pavel Machek
2011-01-02 18:49 ` David Brown
2011-01-03 5:50 ` Pavel Machek
2011-01-04 18:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-12-20 21:49 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2010-12-20 21:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 22:10 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-12-20 20:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] hvc_dcc: Simplify put_chars()/get_chars() loops Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 20:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] hvc_dcc: Simplify assembly for v6 and v7 ARM Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 21:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-04 18:52 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2011-01-06 1:49 ` [PATCH 0/3] hvc_dcc cleanups and fixes Stephen Boyd
2011-01-06 3:20 ` Greg KH
2011-02-03 22:17 ` Greg KH
2011-02-03 23:19 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-03 23:30 ` Greg KH
2011-02-03 23:48 ` [PATCHv2 " Stephen Boyd
2011-02-03 23:48 ` [PATCHv2 1/3] hvc_dcc: Fix bad code generation by marking assembly volatile Stephen Boyd
2011-02-03 23:48 ` [PATCHv2 2/3] hvc_dcc: Simplify put_chars()/get_chars() loops Stephen Boyd
2011-02-03 23:48 ` [PATCHv2 3/3] hvc_dcc: Simplify assembly for v6 and v7 ARM Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110104185256.GD7771@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).