From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] arm: Kconfig: remove duplicated GENERIC_HARDIRQS entry
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 21:54:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110104205445.GF25121@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110104173301.GA25976@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Hi Russell,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:33:01PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:00:31PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 02:02:55PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > @@ -171,9 +168,6 @@ config FIQ
> > > config ARCH_MTD_XIP
> > > bool
> > >
> > > -config GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ
> > > - def_bool y
> > > -
> > You didn't mention this change in the commit log. Is this duplicated,
> > too or did it just slip through?
>
> If you look at kernel/irq/Kconfig (as I did with the original patch)
> you'd notice kernel/irq/Kconfig defines both of these symbols being
> removed when HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS is enabled.
>
> If you read the discussion in the previous version of this patch set,
> you'd notice that the removal of this was specifically requested.
>
> It's very tiresome to have to re-explain these things. Please take
> some more time to research the points you bring up, rather than
I don't agree here 100%. IMHO the commit log was not good enough for
the change introduced by the patch (and Felipe's reply suggests that he
agrees). I could still research it, but:
- it was not obvious for me there was a previous version (no "v2" or
similar in the patch subject);
- for me it would take say 5 minutes to check, the author knows
the answer to my question immediately (at least he should);
- after a research I could suggest a better wording, but I don't care
much if it's me or Felipe who comes up with a better text.
So all in all I'm still confident that my mail was OK.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-04 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-04 12:02 [PATCH 0/4] ARM IRQ Changes Felipe Balbi
2011-01-04 12:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm: omap: gpio: don't access irq_desc array directly Felipe Balbi
2011-01-05 0:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-01-05 6:47 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-01-05 17:11 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-01-04 12:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm: Kconfig: remove duplicated GENERIC_HARDIRQS entry Felipe Balbi
2011-01-04 14:00 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-01-04 14:09 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-01-04 17:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-04 20:54 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2011-01-05 6:51 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-01-04 12:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm: Kconfig: remove duplicated SPARSE_IRQ entry Felipe Balbi
2011-01-04 12:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm: Kconfig: allow OMAP to use sparse IRQ numbering Felipe Balbi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-04 10:38 [PATCH 2/4] arm: Kconfig: remove duplicated GENERIC_HARDIRQS entry Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110104205445.GF25121@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).