linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] OMAP: TWL: sparse fixes
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 00:25:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110105002549.GA1445@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D238503.6070103@ti.com>

On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 02:37:23PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> hmm.. minor nit (with codesourcery 2010.09-50 - 4.5.1):
> rm arch/arm/mach-omap2/*.o;make C=1 arch/arm/mach-omap2/ 2>Kerr;make C=2  
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/ 2>Kerr1;diff Kerr Kerr1
> [..]
> 1,4d0
> < arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c: In function 'omap_mux_get_by_name':
> < arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c:163:17: warning: 'found_mode' may be used  
> uninitialized in this function
> < arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c: In function 'omap2_clksel_set_parent':
> < arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c:100:35: warning: 'max_clkr' may be  
> used uninitialized in this function
>
> Kinda interesting to note that C=2 does'nt list all potential gcc  
> warnings :( if one wanted a collated list of all warnings, rm .../*.o  
> helps I guess.

C=2 only runs sparse - so if you're committing patches to fix sparse
warnings, that's what you should be interested in.

I'd suggest that fixing sparse warnings and GCC warnings in a single
patch is probably not the best thing to do - GCC warnings are less
subjective than sparse warnings.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-05  0:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-03 18:58 [PATCH 0/2] OMAP: TWL: sparse fixes Nishanth Menon
2011-01-03 18:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] OMAP2+: TWL: make conversion routines static Nishanth Menon
2011-01-03 18:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] OMAP2+: TWL: include pm header for init protos Nishanth Menon
2011-01-03 22:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] OMAP: TWL: sparse fixes Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-03 22:39   ` Nishanth Menon
2011-01-04 20:37     ` Nishanth Menon
2011-01-05  0:25       ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-01-05 13:32         ` Nishanth Menon
2011-01-04 18:00 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-01-04 22:44   ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110105002549.GA1445@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).